Another Lawsuit Launched at Mercedes-Benz in Diesel Litigation Barrage
Mercedes-Benz’s parent company, Daimler, has been hit with a second lawsuit from a U.S. law firm that represents owners of diesel vehicles, despite recent evidence that could render the suit invalid.
The suit from now-familiar firm Hagens Berman accuses the German automaker of employing an emissions “defeat device,” a la Volkswagen, in its diesel vehicles, according to Reuters (via Automotive News).
The suit alleges the device must be the cause of laboratory emissions test results that show higher nitrogen oxide emissions than during real-world tests.
Daimler has refuted the defeat device accusation, calling the class-action lawsuit “unfounded.”
“A component that inadmissibly reduces emissions is not used in Mercedes-Benz vehicles,” said Daimler in a statement.
Yesterday, Reuters reported that the German Federal Motor Transport Authority had completed tests on European diesel models, and found that only Volkswagen employed an emissions-cheating defeat device.
Other models showed irregularities during real-world testing, but they were within legal limits, the report said.
The Environmental Protection Agency requested information from Daimler following the first lawsuit, but no investigation into the automaker was opened. The regulator blew the lid off the Volkswagen diesel emissions scandal by issuing a notice of violation of the Clean Air Act last September.
The exceptionally busy Hagens Berman is also behind a lawsuit filed this week on behalf of an Illinois Volkswagen dealer group, which targets the automaker for diesel-related financial losses.
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Zerofoo No.My wife has worked from home for a decade and I have worked from home post-covid. My commute is a drive back and forth to the airport a few times a year. My every-day predictable commute has gone away and so has my need for a charge at home commuter car.During my most recent trip I rented a PHEV. Avis didn't bother to charge it, and my newly renovated hotel does not have chargers on the property. I'm not sure why rental fleet buyers buy plug-in vehicles.Charging infrastructure is a chicken and egg problem that will not be solved any time soon.
- Analoggrotto Yeah black eyeliner was cool, when Davey Havok was still wearing it.
- Dave M. My sweet spot is $40k (loaded) with 450 mile range.
- Master Baiter Mass adoption of EVs will require:[list=1][*]400 miles of legitimate range at 80 MPH at 100°F with the AC on, or at -10°F with the cabin heated to 72°F. [/*][*]Wide availability of 500+ kW fast chargers that are working and available even on busy holidays, along interstates where people drive on road trips. [/*][*]Wide availability of level 2 chargers at apartments and on-street in urban settings where people park on the street. [/*][*]Comparable purchase price to ICE vehicle. [/*][/list=1]
- Master Baiter Another bro-dozer soon to be terrorizing suburban streets near you...
Comments
Join the conversation
I'm no emissions engineer but I operate around a fleet of Blutec Sprinters in the snowbelt. You just never smell diesel fumes around these van indoors or outdoors, hot or cold. I can't speak for any particulates but MB's done an awesome job compared to other diesels I've endured 30 years. Note: I'm going on about the newer Blutec with DEF not the older smokies.
Is the this a misprint? "laboratory emissions test results that show higher nitrogen oxide emissions than during real-world tests" Seems like the claim is that Mercedes pollutes LESS in the real world than what laboratory tests imply.