Is This a Second-Generation Nissan NV200 Compact Passenger Van? [UPDATE: It's a Serena!]

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

It’s Spy Shot Weekend at TTAC. In addition to the Chinese metal driving around Ann Arbor we published yesterday, here are images of what could be a next-generation Nissan NV200 Compact Passenger van plying the highways of California by way of eagle-eyed TTAC reader Felix.

The current NV200 van is only available in cargo van or Taxi of Tomorrow guises. The latter landed the City of New York in a lengthy legal battle.

The van in the photos has all the hallmarks of being a Nissan prototype, including similar camo to that used on other Nissan models, explained spy photographer Brian Williams in an email.

According to reader and photo submitter Felix, the two vans passed him this morning as he drove westbound on I-80 near Vacaville, California, which is about halfway between Sacramento and San Francisco. Nissan has a Silicon Valley research facility located just an hour-and-a-half south of Vacaville.

Not much in shown in the shots, which Felix pulled from dash cam footage. However, larger side glass and a possible Hoffmeister kink (because sportsvan!) could be in the cards for Nissan’s smallest commercial vehicle. The next NV200 will likely be powered by the same drivetrain it uses currently — a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine mated to a continuously variable transmissions that pushes power to the front wheels.

Update: TTAC reader astoncfw said it’s a Nissan Serena, which isn’t sold in the North American market. Comparing photos of the Serena with the spy shots, it looks like a solid match.

In overseas markets, the Serena is sold as a hybrid with a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine and continuously variable transmission. Nissan claims its the only hybrid van sold in Malaysia.

Sill, what’s it doing in California?

[Images: © 2016 The Truth About Cars]

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Webbrowan Webbrowan on Mar 30, 2016

    I have never had the chance to see a new release vehicle being tested on the roads like this, but truth to God I'd probably be laughing my heads off that the manufacturer can't do something a little bit less conspicuous than this to hide its latest release! It looks like it's wrapped in garbage bags! If they wanted to keep the designs under wraps, surely there's something else that can be done to make the vehicle stand out less on the roads like this!

  • Lostjr Lostjr on Jun 04, 2016

    Two of these are _still_ driving around San Francisco. If these are JDM, (and they are RHD) why are they spending _so much time_ driving around in the US?

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next