Bipartisan Bill Aims to Kill EPA Racecar Regulation

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Attention, racecar enthusiasts: Your Congressional representatives are looking out for you!

Normally, this phrase would be met with suspicion and outright fear, but for those fighting the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed regulation on racecar conversions, it’s the best news they’ve had in weeks.

A bipartisan bill introduced in Congress would protect the track-only use of modified street vehicles for use in competition, a practice the EPA is seeking to prohibit.

The Recognizing the Protection of Motorsports Act of 2016 (RPM Act), introduced by three Republicans and one Democrat, aims to keep converted race vehicles away from the tentacles of the EPA. The bill has been sent to the House Energy and Commerce Committee for consideration.

Racecars are exempt under the Clean Air Act, but there was panic in racing circles when it was revealed the regulatory body had published draft legislation last summer that would make it illegal to modify a street car into a racecar. The EPA saw the modifications as a “tampering” of regulated on-road vehicles, and proposed that the sale and purchase of products involved in the conversions would be subject to the same law.

By the time, the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) found out about the proposal just before the New Year, it was too late to comment. Since the EPA proposal was revealed to the public a month ago, over 163,000 people have signed a White House petition calling on the EPA to back off.

Raucous applause is already emanating from the SEMA camp.

“The EPA’s new interpretation of the Clean Air Act would essentially rewrite the law and 46 years of policy and practice,” said SEMA President and CEO Chris Kersting.

“Without congressional intervention, the racing community and racing parts manufacturers would be operating outside of that new law and could be targeted for enforcement.”

Racing products represent a $1.4 billion annual market, and would be “decimated” if the EPA were to follow through on their plans, according to SEMA. The legislation would have the same effect on hundreds of American racetracks and all associated industries.

The EPA is expected to finalize its regulations this summer, meaning a tsunami of phone calls and emails from opponents will be reaching Congressional representatives very soon.

[Image: Moto “Club4AG” Miwa/Flickr]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • SoCalMikester SoCalMikester on Mar 09, 2016

    if the EPA really wanted to do something useful, theyd mandate OBD2 emissions checks in all states/counties that dont have checks. No dyno, no visual, no sniffer even. Make it cheap and easy.

  • Shaker Shaker on Mar 10, 2016

    "...if the EPA really wanted to do something useful..." I think that the EPA should re-institute rebates on hybrid vehicles (especially CUV's/SUV's) to encourage sales and get the fleet MPG numbers to start rising again - that would be money well-spent. Low gas prices are reaffirming denial on buyers and manufacturers alike.

  • GregLocock That's a bodge, not a solution. Your diff now has bits of broken off metal floating around in it.
  • The Oracle Well, we’re 3-4 years in with the Telluride and right around the time the long term durability issues start to really take hold. This is sad.
  • CoastieLenn No idea why, but nothing about a 4Runner excites me post-2004. To me, they're peak "try-hard", even above the Wrangler and Gladiator.
  • AZFelix A well earned anniversary.Can they also attend to the Mach-E?
  • Jalop1991 The intermediate shaft and right front driveshaft may not be fully engaged due to suspected improper assembly by the supplier. Over time, partial engagement can cause damage to the intermediate shaft splines. Damaged shaft splines may result in unintended vehicle movement while in Park if the parking brake is not engagedGee, my Chrysler van automatically engages the parking brake when we put it in Park. Do you mean to tell me that the idjits at Kia, and the idjit buyers, couldn't figure out wanting this in THEIR MOST EXPENSIVE VEHICLE????
Next