NHTSA Unveils New Tests, New 5-star Safety Rating System for Cars

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on Tuesday announced significant changes to its tests and rating system for every new car in the U.S. Beginning in 2018, new cars will be rated on a five-star system, in half-star increments (for the first time), and will encompass information from new tests — including front overlap crashes already in use by other safety organizations — and pedestrian impact information.

The proposed changes would place an emphasis on active safety features such as blind spot monitoring and crash avoidance systems. The announcement Tuesday followed a statement last month that the agency would recommend automatic emergency braking on new cars beginning in 2018.

“The changes provide more and better information to new-vehicle shoppers that will help accelerate the technology innovations that saves lives,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx.

The proposed changes by NHTSA include a “frontal oblique crash” test similar to tests already used by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The frontal oblique crash would measure the relative safety of a car struck at a 15-degree angle by an object that overlaps 35 percent of the overall car width, on the driver’s side only, according to the proposed rules.

The test mimics the IIHS’s moderate overlap and small overlap crash tests, of which the latter has been particularly onerous for manufacturers to ace.

NHTSA also announced it would test pedestrian safety for new vehicles by measuring head and leg injuries when struck by those vehicles and use new dummies to better measure injuries for drivers and passengers in crashes.

“NHTSA’s 5-Star Safety Ratings program was the first of its kind, and the idea has now spread around the world,” NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind in a statement Tuesday. “Today, we’re adding to that legacy of global safety leadership, ensuring that American consumers have the best possible information about how to protect themselves and their families, and taking a significant step forward in our efforts to save lives and prevent injuries.”


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 17 comments
  • Old_WRX Old_WRX on Dec 10, 2015

    The question is: How much more inattentive will drivers be with all the nannies that make them feel like they don't need to pay attention to avoid an accident? People, at least in this country, seem to have an attitude that they can be as careless as they want and all the safety features on cars and machinery will keep them from getting hurt. Is it just me or do others find this mentality scary?

    • VolandoBajo VolandoBajo on Dec 10, 2015

      It scares the hell out of me to think that the guy in front of me will be texting like hell, not worrying about the car in front of him, because of AEB. Then the car ahead slows down to make a left turn, and his AEB jams hard to avoid an accident. Now I have to worry about not rear ending him because of his abrupt stop. In most states, the car behind will be the legally responsible party, and the AEB will let the careless driver off the hook. Even if I have AEB, there is a good chance an airbag might go off. I agree with the comment that I want a car that keeps me safe if there is an accident, not a car that thinks it can make better situational judgments than I can, no matter how complex the situation. Get the careless drivers off the road. Don't make it easier for them to be more careless, and to inflict more injuries and panic driving changes on other drivers because of their enhanced carelessness, caused and supported by AEB.

  • Tosh Tosh on Dec 13, 2015

    But red turn signals are still OK? Safety my bottom...

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next