Junkyard Find: 1987 Saab 900S

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

About five years ago, the Saab 900 was a relatively common sight in American self-service wrecking yards, but now examples of this Saab 99 descendant are getting rare.

Here’s a non-turbo 900S that I spotted not long ago in a Denver yard.

Almost 200,000 miles, but this Swedish steel will go to The Crusher just 1,390 miles short of that milestone. A weekend road trip from Denver to Des Moines and back would have done the trick.

The interior has some sun-bleaching, but looks good for a 28-year-old car.

The naturally aspirated 16-valve four-cylinder engine in this car made 125 horsepower, which was pretty good for an engine based on the Triumph Slant-4, of TR7 fame.

Of course, Saab had made many improvements to the engine design since the British Leyland days.

How many of us have been burned by a junkyard radio that needs an unobtainable security code to function?

Not rusty, not smashed. Maybe this car developed some expensive mechanical problem (i.e., any mechanical problem) that wasn’t worth fixing, or maybe it was a trade-in that no dealer could sell.

Here’s the complete Saab lineup for 1987 or 1988, including the Viggen airplane (which went out of production a few years later).

Does Geely make jets? HELL NO.






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 69 comments
  • Kmars2009 Kmars2009 on Nov 24, 2015

    SAAB began it's slow decline once GM took over in the 90's. Switching everything to GM platforms and parts resulted in simply a restyled Malibu...with equal poor GM quality. Then when times got tough, GM killed them off. Probably a good thing. Who wanted to pay a premium price for a redone Malibu? Certainly not a premium car shopper!

    • See 1 previous
    • Dave M. Dave M. on Nov 27, 2015

      @krhodes1 Great analysis and very true - much to my dismay, GM extended Saab's life for at least 10 years. You're right though - in all their internal troubles GM did starve Saab of new product...until it was too late. I love my '04 9-3 Aero convertible, but no way would I count on it as a daily driver. Parts and repairs are expensive with limited availability of parts and knowledgeable mechanics, but no worse than a typical European car. Here's a great read.... http://www.steadysaabin.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Who-killed-Saab-Automobile.pdf

  • Kmars2009 Kmars2009 on Nov 29, 2015

    I would rather SAAB die with some dignity, than part of the GM junkpile. They almost killed Suzuki too, fortunately, after GM ruined their reputation and sales here...they chose to back out. Saving their lives. Anyway...RIP SAAB!

  • Jkross22 It used to be depreciation was the most expensive part of car ownership. Seems like those days are over (New EVs and lux cars excluded). Maintenance + insurance have taken over. Dealerships offering 2 years of maintenance means nothing. That's $200 tops. It's the unexpected repairs - a wiring harness, computer module, heater core, AWD problems - that will cost dearly. Brakes can be expensive since many cars now can't have rotors resurfaced. Even independents are charging a lot for this work.
  • FreedMike VW tossed in two years' maintenance on my car, and the next one's due after the lease is up. But all the car's needed has been oil changes and tire rotations. Unfortunately, the OEM tires (Hankook Kinergy) were unrepentant trash and needed to be replaced at around 23,000 miles. So...my maintenance cost over over a little under three years has been t $800 for the new tires. That sucks, but the new tires (Goodyear Eagle Sport) are a massive upgrade over the Hankooks. Ah well.
  • Rna65689660 2015 Ford Edge V6 AWD: 176k miles. One set of Cooper tires, rear brakes, rear struts. Oil change every 10k miles. 1 battery, trans and coolant flush at 100k.2013 MINI Cooper S 6mt: 117k miles. Oil change every 10k, 4 sets tires, 3 sets brakes, rotors twice, 2 windshields,1 HVAC rheostat, 1 cv boot cover. This week pcv valve with valve cover and coolant thermostat, lower radiator hose.The MINI gets driven harder.
  • Zipper69 Is Toyota trying to squeeze into a space between the mid and full size trucks, both ICE and hybrid?That market can only be sliced so thin until it's a continuous, amorphous mélange and a confused market and irritated buyers.
  • FreedMike I have it on good authority that Subaru asked Subaru buyers what they wanted out of the Legacy, and they came up with the following cryptic mission: "So outdoorsy I can feel the poison ivy." Subsequently, they tried to add at least 10 square yards of black plastic cladding to the side of the Legacy, creating the Legacy "Lost In The Woods" edition, but the supplier pulled out, thus sealing the Legacy's fate. RIP.
Next