Judge: Communication Between GM, Lawyers About Ignition Switches Can Stay Secret
A federal judge Wednesday denied a request to make available communication between GM and its lawyers over certain cases involving defective ignition switches, Reuters reported. The documents will remain secret because of attorney-client privilege, the judge wrote.
Lawsuits against GM allege that the company tried to further cover up its defective ignition switches. Those lawsuits sought to uncover documents between the automaker and its lawyers in three separate cases.
“… the case evaluations have all the hallmarks of dispassionate, sober evaluations (perhaps, in hindsight, too dispassionate and sober for their own good) by counsel of the costs and benefits of litigating the cases to their conclusion — just what one would might expect in a defense file and in the absence of a crime or fraud,” Judge Jesse Furman wrote in his ruling.
Furman wrote that the allegations against GM may ultimately be proven in court, but that the plaintiffs didn’t show enough cause to force GM to turn over its communication.
New GM’s and (King & Spalding’s) conduct may well have contributed to the delay in public disclosure of the ignition switch defect. And it may well be that Plaintiffs can ultimately prove (as the criminal charges against New GM certainly suggest) that there was an intentional scheme on the part of some at New GM to conceal the ignition switch defect from the public and NHTSA (and that the confidential settlements served to facilitate that scheme).
According to the ruling, the plaintiffs already have many documents between GM and their lawyers, and that the automaker was less-than forthcoming with many records relating to the defective switches.
This year, federal regulators announced a $900 million fine against the automaker for the faulty switches installed in Chevrolet, Saturn and Pontiac cars that could disable a car’s safety systems that resulted in 124 deaths.
GM announced a $625 million settlement with affected families earlier this year.
The ruling can be read here.
More by Aaron Cole
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Dukeisduke Womp womp.
- FreedMike China's whining about unfair trade practices? Okay.
- Kwik_Shift Hyunkia'sis doing what they do best...subverting expectations of quality.
- MaintenanceCosts People who don't use the parking brake when they walk away from the car deserve to have the car roll into a river.
- 3-On-The-Tree I’m sure they are good vehicles but you can’t base that on who is buying them. Land Rovers, Bentley’ are bought by Robin Leaches’s “The Rich and Famous” but they have terrible reliability.
Comments
Join the conversation
I wish this weren't something the judge had to clarify. GM obviously fucked up, but that doesn't mean rights must be forfeited.
And nobody at GM will be found personally accountable or liable and so no deterrent will be created and the whole sick charade will occur under slightly different circumstances somewhere sometime again. These things since 2000: Ford: Firestone tires, TI cruise control sensors: fuel-economy ratings Mitsubishi: multiple and various Toyota: track bars, floor mats, gas pedals Honda: air bags Takata: seat-belts, air bags GM: ignition switches, EPAS Hyundai: fuel-economy ratings Chrysler: under-reported fatalities VW: NOx, CO2, under-reported fatalities The law should be amended banning the use of non-disclosure agreements in settlements connected to injury and death, as well as the settlement agreement to be posted in the NHTSA website. This will put the onus on the OEMs and suppliers to rapidly fix and recall in order to save cost of suits and settlements.