Before You Buy That 2016 Ford Focus RS, You Should Know Something

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

There may be a quicker one coming.

That’s if you believe what Autocar reported Thursday. According to the British publication, Ford engineers in Europe are already be whispering there could be a lighter, quicker version of the 2016 Ford Focus RS coming. Engineers are reportedly aiming for a sub-4 second 0-60 run.

The increased performance won’t come by way of a bigger engine however — the laws of thermodynamics in cramped spaces preclude a bigger bolt-on snail, apparently — but rather the ol’ Colin Chapman route: adding more lightness.

The very detailed description of what Focus RS engineers could do in a hotter version starts with shedding seats, sound-deadening materials and setting MyFord Touch on fire (probably not). Carbon fiber body parts, aluminum suspension, carbon fiber brakes and irreplaceable body parts made from unobtainium would probably come next.

Putting the Focus on a severe diet could save more than 200 pounds, according to Autocar, but it probably wouldn’t be sufficient enough to reduce the Focus RS’s sprint up to 60 mph from 4.7 seconds to less than 4 seconds.

Improvements in the drivetrain — including swapping the manual box for an automatic — may not necessarily shed more weight (the 6-speed Getrag DCT in the Focus weighs 28 pounds more than the 6-speed manual, for instance) but would swap cogs faster on mythical runs up to 60 mph.

Better grip from specially designed Michelin gumballs, carbon fiber wheels from the GT350R and a beefy front limited-slip differential up front and voila! you have a hatchback that probably costs more than $50,000 and doesn’t comfortably seat anyone other than you.

Of course, two things need to happen first: a hotter Focus RS would need to exist; and, it would have to come to the States. Let’s not hold our breath.

Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • TrailerTrash TrailerTrash on Nov 12, 2015

    adding auto would make it less "race car" but make it more a possibility in my house. Nobody wants any more manuals here. Even the Miata I was looking at is never going to be a standard shift...they sternly have told me.Everybody is getting lazy and the mountains and hills are killing it in my house. This is the same reason I never was allowed to have the speed3. Besides...drinking coffee, eating hamburgers and texting is equally important it seems today.......

  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Nov 12, 2015

    Front end looks like some sort of mutant fish with its mouth open.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next