NHTSA Deepening Probe Into Ford F-150 Brakes

by Aaron Cole

Updated: December 30th, 2020 Published: October 20th, 2015

nhtsa deepening probe into ford f 150 brakes

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will look further into claims that 2011-2012 F-150 trucks may have a faulty brake vacuum pump on cold starts that caused seven crashes, including one injury, the Detroit News reported.

According to the report, nearly 253,000 trucks are affected by the investigation. Ford has said that it will comply with the investigation and that a recall shouldn’t be necessary for the trucks because the failing vacuum pump will sufficiently notify drivers before braking distance is significantly impacted.

According to NHTSA, the agency began investigating complaints of ineffective brakes at cold start in June. Ford provided the agency with data from 396 complaints.

According to the automaker, water leaking into the vacuum pump is to blame for the eroding vacuum.

Ford hasn’t yet recalled the trucks, although escalating the investigation into an engineering analysis is a necessary step before NHTSA can order the automaker to recall its vehicles.

One owner said their truck was nearly incapacitated in the morning, and that Ford service technicians were unaware of the problem in September, after the investigation started in June:

The below problem has repeated itself more than 20 times since the first incident. When parked overnight or over a long period of time, upon starting and operating the truck – either reverse or drive – the brakes fail to engage the first one or two times. Had to either hit the brakes very hard or i had to revert the truck to P(parking) position. This just about works to bring the truck to a halt, but even this failed a couple of times when D(driving forward). Thankfully, no one was around for 10 meters. This has led me to only starting the vehicle when there is no person/object either in front or the rear. It is high-risk each time given the damage the truck can do if it collides into something. … The possible issues could be the vacuum pump failing, but Ford technicians claim to have never heard of this problem. Really at a loss and hope Ford sends out a bulletin to fix this ASAP. This is not a joke. It’s life threatening and could cause real damage very soon.

#2011 #2012 #Brakes #F-150 #Ford #NHTSA #Recall #Safety #VacuumPump

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 13 comments

Mike1dog on Oct 20, 2015

Looking at what the dealer cost is on a vacuum pump, I can see why Ford doesn't want to replace all of them. Of course, dealer cost will suddenly be adjusted to about a tenth of that price if and when a recall occurs.

Like Reply
Dantes_inferno on Oct 21, 2015

Ford should implement a supplemental emergency braking system on their F-150s. The formal name for this system is called a boat anchor.

Like Reply
- DeadWeight on Oct 21, 2015
  
  Or tailgate parachute.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.