Honda HR-V Outsells Fit By Four-To-One, But Why?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

During the first three months of Honda HR-V availability, U.S. sales of the Honda Fit jumped 25 percent.

Yet as the public’s HR-V awareness increased – and sales of the Fit-based subcompact CUV decreased due to supply constraints – Fit sales fell through the floor in August and September of 2015. August sales of the Fit were cut in half; September Fit volume plunged 81 percent, falling 5,349 units from what was a 41-month high in September 2014 to only 1,279 sales in September 2015.

U.S. HR-V sales in September were nearly four times stronger than Fit sales, an astonishing figure for a number of reasons.

First, the HR-V wasn’t even close to its peak year-to-date output in September. Sales in June, the HR-V’s first full month, were 68-percent higher.

Second, the Fit is still among the newest subcompacts available. Only the Scion iA sedan, which kicked off its U.S. campaign last month, is a fresher design.

Finally, the very concept of the HR-V and its rivals — slight ride height increases, marginal cargo volume advantages, subdued SUV styling cues, available all-wheel-drive — is a new one for most buyers. Yet combined sales of the HR-V and its cohorts jumped 158 percent in September. Even the more established players, nameplates which were on sale at this time a year ago, rose 24 percent last month.

Yet to instantly surmise that Fit sales are falling simply because thousands of potential Fit buyers are opting instead for an HR-V misses a few key points. Yes, the market is clearly, undoubtedly, undeniably moving away from traditional passenger cars to crossovers, as evidenced by the fact that the auto industry may in 2015 report a 15-year high in total volume despite the fact that passenger car sales are down two percent.

In this particular case, however, there other factors at play. The 2015 Fit has been involved in three separate recalls: the first for side curtain airbags, one for ignition coils, and most recently another for continuously variable transmissions. In this age, however, recalls seem to have little effect on consumer demand.

But what demand there is for the Fit, Honda has little capacity to meet. Between the beginning of 2012 and the end of this July, American Honda averaged 4,700 monthly Fit sales. Demand for the car didn’t suddenly disappear, almost completely, because the HR-V arrived, even if that fits the easy narrative.

In fact, as we already mentioned, coinciding with the HR-V’s launch was a significant Fit sales increase, equalling a 3,045-unit year-over-year improvement between May and July.

Then, Fit supply suddenly dried up. Think back to the beginning of September last year and Honda dealers had a 79-day supply of Fits, approximately 11,000 Fits available for sale. One year later, at the beginning of last month, Honda’s U.S. dealers had just a 27-day supply of Fits; only 3,000 units in stock according to Automotive News. Indeed, combined Fit/HR-V inventory last month was lower than total Fit inventory was one year ago.

Honda needs more capacity for the HR-V, which is built at the Fit’s factory in Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico. Subcompact crossovers can be very profitable vehicles, and demand for subcompact crossovers is rising. Subcompact cars aren’t very profitable vehicles, and demand for subcompact cars is decreasing. Therefore, “It’s nothing more than a case of numbers,” according to American Honda spokesperson Robyn Eagles. “We are producing more HR-Vs than Fits.”

The situation is now made all the more apparent by the move of some MY2016 Fit production to Japan. Add that to the fact that MY2015 Fits are few and far between – Cars.com lists fewer than 800 in their inventory – and the results are, while far from ideal, rather obvious. U.S. Honda Fit sales in September 2015 were down by four-fifths compared with September 2014.

All fingers pointed at the HR-V? Hardly. HR-V pricing begins at $19,995, $685 in excess of the outgoing Civic’s base MSRP; 20-percent higher than the basic Fit’s sticker. If there’s a group of car buyers unwilling to fork out an extra 20 percent of their hard-earned, it’s the 42,000 people who buy or lease a subcompact car each month. Might some have them moved up the ladder to get into an HR-V in September? Sure, but they don’t explain the Fit’s 81 percent decline.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 144 comments
  • RideHeight RideHeight on Oct 21, 2015

    Ooh... you make so mad I put wrong place!

  • Tubacity Tubacity on Oct 23, 2015

    Cannot reasonably think about sales figures of a vehicle without including non Honda in the comparison. For example, Nissan Versa Note is a hatchback, 4 door, small, low power. Compared to FIT, more available, less cargo room, lower price. Also, NVH are better than Fit and acceptable on long drives. Fortunately, buyers do cross shop and do buy something other than Honda.

  • Marc Muskrat only said what he needed to say to make the stock pop. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along.
  • SCE to AUX I never believed they cancelled it. That idea was promoted by people who concluded that the stupid robotaxi idea was a replacement for the cheaper car; Tesla never said that.
  • 28-Cars-Later 2018 Toyota Auris: Pads front and back, K&N air filter and four tires @ 30K, US made Goodyears already seem inferior to JDM spec tires it came with. 36K on the clock.2004 Volvo C70: Somewhere between $6,5 to $8 in it all told, car was $3500 but with a wrecked fender, damaged hood, cracked glass headlight, and broken power window motor. Headlight was $80 from a yard, we bought a $100 door literally for the power window assembly, bodywork with fender was roughly a grand, brakes/pads, timing belt/coolant and pre-inspection was a grand. Roof later broke, parts/labor after two repair trips was probably about $1200-1500 my cost. Four 16in Cooper tires $62 apiece in 2022 from Wal Mart of all places, battery in 2021 $200, 6qts tranny fluid @ 20 is $120, maybe $200 in labor last year for tranny fluid change, oil change, and tire install. Car otherwise perfect, 43K on the clock found at 38.5K.1993 Volvo 244: Battery $65, four 15in Cooper tires @ $55 apiece, 4 alum 940 wheels @ roughly $45 apiece with shipping. Fixes for random leaks in power steering and fuel lines, don't remember. Needs rear door and further body work, rear door from yard in Gettysburg was $250 in 2022 (runs and drives fine, looks OK, I'm just a perfectionist). TMU, driven maybe 500 miles since re-acquisition in 2021.
  • 1995 SC I never hated these. Typical GM though. They put the wrong engine in it to start with, fixed it, and then killed it. I say that as a big fan of the aluminum 5.3, but for how they were marketing this it should have gotten the Corvette Motor at the start. Would be a nice cruiser though even with the little motor. The 5.3 without the convertible in a package meant to be used as a truck would have been great in my mind, but I suspect they'd have sold about 7 of them.
  • Rochester I'd rather have a slow-as-mud Plymouth Prowler than this thing. At least the Prowler looked cool.
Next