Bark's Bites: Nissan Doesn't Make A Single Car You Want To Buy

Mark "Bark M." Baruth
by Mark "Bark M." Baruth
barks bites nissan doesnt make a single car you want to buy

When I arrived at the Emerald Aisle at LAX on Wednesday, I had a slight moment of excitement when I saw a low-mileage Nissan 370Z coupe resting comfortably in the far corner of the Executive area. You see, I very nearly bought a Z back in 2005, and the car has always held a special interest for me. Back then, the Mazda RX-8 and the Nissan 350Z held quite a grip on the young American car culture—the Z was the official ride of Drift King in The Fast and The Furious: Tokyo Drift (a fine and underrated film, in the opinion of your author). I tried to talk my father into buying a 350Z convertible a couple of years later, and I nearly succeeded, too, until his wife got a look at it and declared it to be “impractical.”

So I sauntered over as casually as possible, so as not to alert my fellow National customers to the presence of the Z on the lot, and quickly threw my bags in the back. “Aha,” I thought. “I won the Rental Car Lottery today!”

Then I started to drive it.

The seven-speed automatic transmission felt clunky and forever inbetween gears. The six-cylinder VQ motor sounded like it was being simultaneously strangled and flogged with a Cat O’ Nine Tails. There wasn’t a seating position that I could find that even resembled comfort. The stereo’s display looked like it was straight out of a Tandy tape deck, and the sound it put forth was sonically wretched. It was decently quick, but any similarly priced Mustang or Camaro would look better, sound better, and be at least competitive in a straight line with the woefully outdated Z.

In other words, I hated it. I got so bizarrely angry about my decision that I promptly drove it to the Hustler Casino on the edge of Compton and parked it conspicuously in the back of the lot in the hopes that somebody might steal it, and then National would be forced to deliver another car to me. Like, any other car.

It occurred to me as I drove it to Auto Club Speedway today with my good friend Matt Farah, who alternately described the sound of the the VQ as “rough” and “worse than a GM 3800” as he squirmed uncomfortably in the passenger seat, that Nissan, the company who used to make things that kids actually put on their walls as aspirational dreams, doesn’t manufacture a single, solitary car that anybody would consider to be the best or most desirable car in its class. Not one.

What is Nissan good at? Who are they? What’s their brand identity? I’m not sure anybody knows these answers. At this point, one could make a solid case that Nissan’s best car is…the Leaf. Ouchies.

In each segment in which Nissan competes, they are no better than a third option, and in most cases, they’re worse than that. Versa? Pretty sure I’d rather have a Fiesta or a Fit. Sentra…wait, they still make the Sentra? No kidding. Huh. Hard to make a case for it against any of the cars in the segment. The Altima is the official vehicle of people who say things like “I need a car but I don’t like cars or really know anything about them but I just wrecked mine so I need to replace it with something.” Would anybody actually pick a Maxima over a V6 Impala? The trucks are okay, but they’re such also-rans in the segment that I sometimes forget that they exist. The CUVs are setting new standards, but only for being completely and utterly forgettable. The GT-R sells in such low numbers as to be statistically insignificant.

And the Z. The spiritual successor to some truly great cars, it now just feels old and forgotten. Seriously — go back and watch Tokyo Drift and tell me that you didn’t want a Z when you saw that film. Now? According to our own Tim Cain, only about 6,000 people have bought a Z in 2015 so far. Compare that to the Camaro — another car that came out only a year after the 370Z, has been aging badly, and is finally getting a replacement — which has sold over 60,000 units. The Z, as it stands today, is no longer a relevant car in the marketplace.

Now, here’s the question: Does the completely ho-hum nature of their lineup even matter? I can make an argument that it doesn’t — or at least, it’s not doing them much harm. Nissan’s year-over-year growth is actually decent. They do face a growing threat from Hyundai-Kia in their quest to hold onto the number six spot in the U.S. market, but their position in the marketplace seems stable.

But, it does make me sad. As a 16-year-old boy in 1994, I lusted after a Nissan Sentra SE-R in the worst way. I watched friends of mine drive NX 2000s, and I was pea green with envy. I used to love rolling up to school in my dad’s ’87 Maxima as a child. And the Z32 300Zx? Well, that was just about as good as it got.

I have a friend who loves Nissan. However, as much as he adores the brand, he, too, has admitted to me that they don’t have a single class-leading car. He was excited, however, when I posted a picture of my rental Z to my Facebook wall earlier this week. “Would be interested to know your thoughts,” he posted.

You want to know my thoughts? Here are my thoughts. The car is awful. I’m sure that a manual transmission would have helped, but it wouldn’t have helped nearly enough.

Let me go on. The brand is terrible. I wouldn’t buy anything they sell, and I honestly can’t recommend that anybody else does, either. No, they don’t sell bad cars. They just don’t sell any good ones. I’d honestly be surprised if anybody even makes a Nissan poster in 2015, and I’d be even more surprised if any tweens asked for one for their bedroom walls.

In closing, allow me to paraphrase the great lyricist, Everclear, here. Nissan, it’s time to pack it up. Nobody is fooled by your RACE CAR ALTIMA OMG WOW commericals. You don’t have a brand. You don’t have an image. You don’t have a halo car. You’ve got bland, boring cars.

Are you going to do anything about it? For the sake of your fans, shouldn’t you?

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 267 comments
  • Stanczyk Stanczyk on Nov 03, 2015

    Lets not forget that Nissan is the only japanesee automaker that still tries to produce sporty-cars .. Both 370Z and GTR are unique and oryginal .. Especially GTR is quite cool car ((very fast and..easy to navigate even though it/s big and heavy .. and .. front/face ugly > it should look more like that one >) http://img10.deviantart.net/4d54/i/2006/178/5/8/nissan_skyline_concepts_by_iacoski.jpg If they’ll succesfully refresh GTR and Z .. and add sth like that to the party .. http://www.autotribute.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Nissan-IDx-Nismo-Concept.jpg .. they would have a really unique sporty-department lineup ..

  • Svan Svan on Nov 04, 2015

    This is entirely true. There isn't a single Nissan I'm interested in. I used to think the Sentra SE-R was interesting, and the Z's have always have been an object of desire. But nowadays? Not a chance. Infiniti lost the plot for this well-off 42 yo male car lover years ago. Except, of course, the GT-R. If I was looking for a 50-80k track toy, that would be right at the top of my list, but likely nostalgia would win and I'd get a nice clean older NSX and take a few trips of a lifetime with the money I "save".

  • Tassos No car "needs" a manual today.No Driver "needs" a manual today.Let's use the english language precisely.Only some Drivers WANT a manual.And most people who make a lot of noise about how good manuals are, then go out and buy another AUTOMATIC.Auto Journalists are always very fond of manuals.Actual CAR BUYERS in the US BUY 99% automatics, regardless of what they CLAIM.30 years ago, automatics were lousy and inefficient and had too few gears and manuals had better MPG and cost $1-2k less to buy a manual vs an auto car.Today all these advantages have gone up in smoke.
  • Tassos I have driven exclusively manuals in my own cars for the first 30-40 years of my driving history. They were usually very affordable, fuel efficient simple vehicles with front wheel drive. Their manuals sucked (in the case of a 1983 GM vehicle I bought new) or were perfect (in my two 5-sp manual Hondas).After 2005, I started driving excellent 5 and 7 speed automatics in my own cars, which were NOT available in the US market with manuals.With today's outstanding automatics, which are also MORE, not LESS, fuel efficient than any manual, your question becomes MEANINGLESS.Because NO CAR "needs" a manual.Only some DRIVERS "WANT", NOT "NEED", a manual.Let us use language PRECISELY.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic And this too shall pass.....Ford went thru this when the model T was introduced. It took the moving assembly line to make real money. As time progressed, it got refined, eventually moving to the Model A. Same kind of hiccups with fuel injection, 4 speed automatic, Firestone tires, dashboards with no radio knobs, etc, etc, etc. Same thing with EVs. Yep, a fire or two in the parking lot, espresso time at the charging stations, other issues yet to be encountered, just give it time. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Art Vandelay 2025 Camaro and Challenger
  • Mike Beranek Any car whose engine makes less than 300 ft-lbs of torque.
Next