By on September 16, 2015

suzuki-volkswagen-partnership

Suzuki, while at Frankfurt showing off its new Baleno hatchback and next-generation Vitara, is dealing with a financial problem of sorts.

In order to buy itself back from Volkswagen, the Japanese automaker will have to shell out 471.74 billion yen — or $3.9 billion USD. Suzuki plans to purchase as many of those shares back as possible during off-hours trading, before the bell rings Thursday morning.

“It’s good that a resolution came. I feel refreshed. It’s like clearing a bone stuck in my throat,” said Osamu Suzuki to reporters gathered at a news conference in Tokyo a couple of weeks ago. “I’m very satisfied with the resolution. Through it, Suzuki was able to attain its biggest objective.”

Volkswagen was ordered to sell back its 19.9-percent stake in Suzuki last month.

The $3.9 billion figure represents the number of shares held by Volkswagen — 122.77 million — multiplied by Wednesday’s closing share price.

According to Reuters, at least one Suzuki shareholder, U.S.-based hedge fund Third Point LLC, has urged Suzuki to cancel the shares after they are purchased and that the automaker should focus on improving value for existing shareholders.

Suzuki reportedly had nearly $8 billion USD in cash reserves at the end of March.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

18 Comments on “Suzuki Will Spend $3.9 Billion to Buy Itself Back from Volkswagen...”


  • avatar
    CoreyDL

    By the way, Baleno is just another name for Esteem, lawl. Doesn’t look too impressive.

    http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/16/2016-suzuki-baleno-frankfurt-2015/

    And the new Vitara looks pretty meh also.

    http://topsuvs2016.com/2016-suzuki-grand-vitara/

  • avatar
    korvetkeith

    I love my suzuki outboards. I think their motorcycles have a similarly good rep. Makes me think they should be able to do cars well too. But maybe those first two markets are less regulated enough that it’s easier to be successful.

  • avatar
    CJinSD

    Suzuki ruined its reputation by selling rebadged Daewoos in the US. GM improved its reputation by selling rebadged Daewoos in the US. Where you wind up is all about where you start.

    • 0 avatar
      derekson

      The quality of the Daewoos in question changed a lot too. The Korean Automotive industry has come a long way in the last 10-15 years. You only need to look at how far Hyundai and Kia have come to see that as well.

  • avatar
    qfrog

    Looks like they are waltzing in the picture.

  • avatar
    28-Cars-Later

    $8 billion in cash is pretty good for a third tier automaker.

  • avatar
    VoGo

    Why is divorce so expensive?

    Because, it’s worth it.

  • avatar
    th009

    That’s EUR 3.45 billion … in purely financial terms, VW gets paid handsomely for this misadventure, given that they paid only EUR 1.7 billion for those same shares in 2010.

    But Osamu Suzuki gets to still be in charge, so I suspect he won’t mind paying a few billion for that privilege.

  • avatar

    Does FCA have $8 bil cash on hand? It would make sense for Sergio to “merge” with Suzuki. VW can take care of GM.

    • 0 avatar
      Lorenzo

      FCA has $8 billion net debt, not cash. According to its balance sheet, it has $40 billion in long term debt, so it must have a pile of cash to get the net down to $8 billion. It just can’t spend it, or the company will look like it’s hanging by a thread, which it is. That’s why Sergio wants to merge with somebody – to off-load that debt so his bosses the Agnellis can bail out of the car business, and Sergio can retire with a big payoff.

  • avatar
    TDIGuy

    I always hoped Suzuki cars would hold on in Canada. Despite attempting to sell a rebadged Nissan as their pickup truck (the worst selling vehicle in Canada, I think they sold like 22 or so). The SX4 was a good mini CUV built in partnership with Fiat, so I was hoping FCA might move it over to their stable once Suzuki disappeared from North American shores. Kizashi was good and they made a real off road capable SUV that wasn’t overly expensive.

    Aside from the whole rebadged Daewoo thing, I wonder if they ever lived down the whole Samurai rollover debacle? Not that it bothered me, but those stories tend to live longer than the actual issue.

  • avatar
    wmba

    “one Suzuki shareholder, U.S.-based hedge fund Third Point LLC, has urged Suzuki to cancel the shares after they are purchased”

    Yes, poor old Daniel Loeb at Third Point might not make his vaunted 20% return this year. Tough. I imagine that Suzuki is highly uninterested in what Loeb thinks – he’s a piker compared to VW. Usually Western companies cave into Loeb’s blandishments about being more efficient (so as to drive up share prices) from his lofty perch of 6 or 8% of the shares, but Sony told him to take a hike and there was nothing he could do about it. Same here.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • teddyc73: “Not to mention that in a very un-FCA/Stellantis move, most materials feel nice or at least...
  • teddyc73: I can’t believe how many times I have heard this same story. It is always the wives who vehemently...
  • bradfa: When do we get a Hellcat version of the Pacifica? I guess they’d need it to be under the Dodge brand,...
  • mcs: MitchConner: “Get rid of the overhead.” How about getting rid of the financial drain of these...
  • ShoogyBee: Here in Milwaukee, Kias and Hyundais are being stolen left and right. Visit the Milwaukee subreddit and...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber