Feds Say They'll Tighten Emissions Tests to Catch Cheaters

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Officials from the Environmental Protection Agency said this week that they’ll change regulations to hopefully catch carmakers who cheat on emissions tests in the future.

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy told reporters at a Wall Street Journal forum Tuesday that the agency would be “upping its game” to stop automakers like Volkswagen from creating two dramatically different emissions cycles for its cars — a cleaner “testing mode” and a dirtier real-world mode. The agency said it would also crack down on automakers who lie about real-world fuel economy.

“Writing regulations takes time,” EPA’s director of the Office of Transportation and Air Quality Chris Grundler told the Detroit News. “When you are working in the rapidly changing environment that we’re in right now, we want to make sure that we are agile enough and flexible enough to change with those times.”

The EPA has cracked down on five different automakers recently for misstating fuel economy figures. In addition to Ford and Hyundai, the agency has forced BMW to restate its mileage for its Mini Cooper Hardtop and Mercedes has been forced to lower its fuel economy figures for two of its cars.

Ironically, the EPA opposes a proposal that could have helped to uncover the malicious code in Volkswagens that helped those cars skirt the rules.

Of course, there may be some mileage in just testing the cars themselves, instead of relying on self-reporting automakers. But we’re not smart like them.

(Photo courtesy Coolceasar/Wikimedia Commons)


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
32 of 35 comments
  • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Sep 24, 2015

    Another diversionary tactic to draw attention away from the ecological damage the EPA did with the King Goldmine spill near Silverton, Colorado.

    • See 17 previous
    • Mopar4wd Mopar4wd on Sep 24, 2015

      @golden2husky To be fair boats have emission controls since 2006 but very few new boats have been sold since 2009 so there are limited numbers with modern engines. But yes boating in general is fairly light on regulation.

  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Sep 24, 2015

    By 'upping their game', it will be interesting to see if that means they begin testing vehicles themselves or fund a 3rd party on a consistent basis to do so.

    • See 8 previous
    • Fred Fred on Sep 25, 2015

      @Fred My point is that EPA/States should use this data to certify your car and keep the manufacturer's honest. I don't see any attempt to do that.

  • SunnyvaleCA SunnyvaleCA on Sep 24, 2015

    This all sounds to me like the EPA is asleep at the wheel, not enforcing the rules already on the books. I would think that the EPA would spot-check the most popular diesel engine in the market for the last 5 years. Even if they didn't suspect cheating/fraud, I would think the EPA would like to see how its benchmark requirements fair in the real world. Maybe the EPA should have a bounty for whistleblowers and/or people who bring cheating to the EPA's attention.

  • Tedward Tedward on Sep 24, 2015

    Thank you for that link at the bottom of the article about the epa opposing ecu software dissemination. I had wrongly assumed that they were in favour of having this access, and that they didn't see that it would only open up the aftermarket tuning game to more players. The wired article was really unsympathetic to that argument. I think that speaks poorly of their understanding of the topic at hand. This is a complicated industry, making the most complicated consumer goods out there, you'd think that editors would assign stories to writers with a decent background in it. Sometimes you need an expert.

    • Anomaly149 Anomaly149 on Sep 25, 2015

      Altering a vehicle's software can have a lot of repercussions. You can access everything over the CAN bus, from the airbag system to the anti-pinch on the power liftgate, from the emissions system to the fly by wire brake and gas pedals and the EPAS unit. The lights, infotainment, and traction control are just icing on the cake. The "big deal" here is when a car hits the used markets with a stance bro's custom tune on all of that. Just wait till the mods and all put a grandma in a Civic into a tree. No argument about prior restraint will bring back Nana, unfortunately, and the family is pretty sure that it's Honda's fault that the car's electronics could be modified in that way. The really interesting question in the future will be how many used car dealers are interested in reflashing a car's computer before sale?

Next