US Tire Makers Oppose New Restrictions On Chinese Tires - It's A Union Thing

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

The United States International Trade Commission issued a split 3-3 ruling on a petition regarding Chinese tires filed by the United Steel Workers under U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty (AD/CVD) laws. That means that — in all likelihood — the United States will put tariffs or other controls on tires imported from China. Counterintuitively, not one of the nine domestic American tire companies that produce 100 percent of the tires made here supports the AD/CVD petition.

Don Ikenson at Forbes explains the domestic tire producers’ lack of support for the ruling is due to the steel workers union not really being interested in stopping Chinese imports, but rather gaining power to use against their negotiating partners here in the United States.

The United Steel Workers represents about 40 percent of American tire workers. They were the sole petitioner that argued the domestic manufacturers are the victims of unfair trade. The problem with that argument: over the period of investigation, not only were all nine domestic producers profitable, but also that their profit margins increased at a better rate than either those of the automotive industry or the entire manufacturing sector.

The domestic tire industry is healthy. Capacity utilization in the industry during the investigation was right around 90 percent. To meet anticipated demands, three new entrants in the U.S. tire market will be spending $1.75 billion on new tire factories in the United States. Goodyear has announced $500 million in plant expansions — and that’s on top of $2.4 billion the domestic producers have recently invested in capital improvements.

That hardly sounds like an industry that’s suffering from unfair trade.

Part of the health of the domestic tire producers is because they don’t directly compete with Chinese tires. Domestic producers decided a while ago to focus on premium OEM and replacement tires, leaving the budget and economy side of the business to Chinese producers willing to exchange margins for volume. At the same time, eight of the nine domestic producers make their low-cost tires overseas. The controls on imports wouldn’t help the domestics sell the tires they make in the United States and also make it more expensive to import cheaper tires from China.

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 43 comments
  • SC5door SC5door on Jul 15, 2015

    As with Korea, the Chinese tire industry will catch up eventually. Not long ago I bet people wouldn't have touched a "Made in Korea" tire....now they supply OEM tires for many manufacturers. (Hankook is to open a plant in Tennessee in 2016)

  • Taxman100 Taxman100 on Jul 16, 2015

    I just bought some Kumho's for my 16 year old beater. I figured at a minimum they were made in Korea. I had Pirellis made in Brazil that lasted 76,000 miles, but Pirelli is now owned by the Chicoms. Turns out the Kumhos were made in China. Outside of the economics, I'm not a big fan of Godless socialist, crony economies. I bought some Kelly's last year for another car that were made in the United States - should have done that again. Then again, it is clear the United States government is a Godless, socialist entity as well, along with the vast majority of large multinational U.S. corporations. Management of both are loyal to only what benefits them - power, control, and their stock options.

  • MrIcky 2014 Challenger- 97k miles, on 4th set of regular tires and 2nd set of winter tires. 7qts of synthetic every 5k miles. Diff and manual transmission fluid every 30k. aFe dry filter cone wastefully changed yearly but it feels good. umm. cabin filters every so often? Still has original battery. At 100k, it's tune up time, coolant, and I'll have them change the belts and radiator hoses. I have no idea what that totals up to. Doesn't feel excessive.2022 Jeep Gladiator - 15k miles. No maintenance costs yet, going in for my 3rd oil change in next week or so. All my other costs have been optional, so not really maintenance
  • Jalop1991 I always thought the Vinfast name was strange; it should be a used car search site or something.
  • Theflyersfan Here's the link to the VinFast release: https://vingroup.net/en/news/detail/3080/vinfast-officially-signs-agreements-with-12-new-dealers-in-the-usI was looking to see where they are setting up in Kentucky...Bowling Green? Interesting... Surprised it wasn't Louisville or Northern Kentucky. When Tesla opened up the Louisville dealer around 2019 (I believe), sales here exploded and they popped up in a lot of neighborhoods. People had to go to Indy or Cincinnati/Blue Ash to get one. If they manage to salvage their reputation after that quality disaster-filled intro a few months back, they might have a chance. But are people going to be willing to spend over $45,000 for an unknown Vietnamese brand with a puny dealer/service network? And their press photo - oh look, more white generic looking CUVs. Good luck guys. Your launch is going to have to be Lexus in 1989/1990 perfect. Otherwise, let me Google "History of Yugo in the United States" as a reference point.
  • Schen72 2022 Toyota Sienna, 25k miles[list][*]new 12V battery, covered by warranty[/*][*]new tires @ 24k miles[/*][*]oil change every 10k miles[/*][*]tire rotation every 5k miles[/*][/list]2022 Tesla Model Y, 16k miles[list][*]nothing, still on original tires[/*][/list]
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Elon hates bad press (hence TWITTER circus) So the press jumping up and down screaming ''musk fails cheap EV'' is likely ego-driving this response as per normal ..not to side with tesla or musk but canceling the 25k EV was a good move, selling a EV for barely above cost is a terrible idea in a market where it seems EV saturation is hitting peak
Next