Chicken Tax Ready For The Fryer, Hilux Et Al Not Ready For US Market

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

As key free trade agreements near signing, the chicken tax may soon become a bucket of Kentucky fried goodness. Just don’t hold your breath for a Hilux.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreements would dismantle the 25 percent tariff on light-duty trucks like the Toyota Hilux, Ford Ranger and Volkswagen Amarok, Automotive News reports. The latter agreement would align vehicle regulations between the United States and European Union, as well.

However, even if the tariff were to come down like the Berlin Wall, imports of the aforementioned trucks — and others like them — won’t be forthcoming in the near term for a few other reasons, starting with how many of the 39 total nations involved in their respective trade agreements have pickup truck plants ready to send their wares to the U.S. There, Thailand — which isn’t among those signing at this time — produces most of the world’s mid-size trucks. However, the nation’s government has expressed interest in joining the TPP after its enactment, leading to potential U.S.-bound production.

Another reason for the delay comes down to the dismantling of the tariff itself, which is set to take years, if not decades, with Japan taking the longest at 25 years; the Japanese rollback is part of a bilateral U.S.-Japan side deal concurrent of the TPP.

Safety figures into this, as well, as trucks made for the global market aren’t made for the U.S.’ special needs. Meanwhile, differences in how trucks are packaged — big blingmobiles for American consumers, spartan utility for everyone else — are likely to stem importation for a while.

Finally, some automakers have concerns their products wouldn’t fare well in the U.S., ranging from product overlap and right-sizing, to brand identity.

In time, however, the trucks some have wanted will board container ships bound for ports on both coasts as automakers would come to see how much profit they could reap with the chicken tax tossed in the fryer, leading to more competition in the USDM truck game down the road.

(Photo credit: Toyota)

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 151 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jun 30, 2015

    I thought that is why we were negotiating tariffs so that the US could get easier access to China and other Asian countries. You are not correct thinking that we are lifting this tariff without getting something in return. The original purpose of the Chicken Tax was to retaliated against a 25% poultry tax accessed against cheap US poultry imports. The poultry tax against US poultry no longer exists but the tariff against trucks still remains even though other parts of the Chicken Tax have expired. The Chicken Tax has outlived its intended purpose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax

    • Pch101 Pch101 on Jun 30, 2015

      Argh. You asked why the tariff remains. Answer: Because the FTA deals have not yet been negotiated. When the US gets an FTA, the chicken tax goes away. If other countries are bothered by the chicken tax, then they had better give us something in return. Until they do, they are still subject to it. (And China is not part of the TPP.)

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jun 30, 2015

    I thought we were in the process of negotiating the FTA. This will probably happen and we will reach an agreement. If not then this tax will remain in effect until some agreement is reached in the future. As for the Chicken Tax itself if you would bother to read the link you would understand the original purpose of the tariff and why it has outlived its purpose unless of course you are for more taxes.

    • See 8 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Jun 30, 2015

      @Jeff S - So the Chicken tax is antiquated. OK. So are the world's tariffs. And? It can't really be killed, as it's a 'bargaining chip'. If the US drops it out_of_the_blue, what's there to leverage EU crazy 10 to 22% tariffs on import autos? If the Transporter was profitable for VW, why should anyone in the US care? It didn't sell enough to impact the US pickup market, but it's something the US could take away from VW and Europe in general. The Chicken tax was all about retaliation and sending a stern message. That's all it was, regardless of what pundits and idiot trolls read into it today, about it "propping up" the US fullsize pickup market and other BS. The UAW should hate the Chicken tax and EU tariffs if they have any brains. We already have the best and biggest sellers the EU has to offer. The UAW would be the biggest winners involved if all tariffs went away between the two. Use some commonsense and logic. Remember which OEMs would lose the most if there were no more chicken tax nor EU tariffs. Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, Nissan, Subaru, Mazda, Kia, VW, etc. Most of these already have a decent foothold in Europe and markets around the world and would then have to compete with Ford, GM, Chrysler, UAW cars and trucks overseas, around the world. And on top of that, global OEMs then entering the US market for the 1st time (or reentering) and competing directly "bread and butter" cars from Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota, Subaru, VW, etc. Think about it this time, instead of just reciting old talking points borrowed from BAFO and his sidekick.

  • 1995 SC I wish them the best. Based on the cluster that is Ford Motor Company at the moment and past efforts by others at this I am not optimistic. I wish they would focus on straigtening out the Myriad of issues with their core products first.
  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
Next