Can Hyundai USA Sell 50,000 Copies Of The Santa Cruz Per Year?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain
“There is a very high probability we get the approval of the truck soon.” – Dave Zuchowski, CEO of Hyundai Motor America.

In a sense, the debut of the Santa Cruz Concept at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit this past January was surprising because of its level of production readiness and execution. On the other hand, to those who were aware Hyundai had for years been contemplating the idea of a pickup truck, the Santa Cruz wasn’t a shock at all.

Now, with word that Hyundai is likely to soon green-light production, the case for marketplace success is quickly called up for debate. Even with the arrival of new midsize pickup trucks from General Motors, the non-full-size pickup truck market remains relatively small at just 15% of the overall pickup truck category and 2.2% of the overall industry’s volume through the first four months of 2015.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOUR


But, the advocates will say, a production Santa Cruz wouldn’t be a traditional pickup truck. Hyundai knows better than to whittle a decade away in the full-size genre like Nissan has with the Titan. The Santa Cruz will likely be a sibling to the third-generation Hyundai Tucson.

Forget V8 power, the Santa Cruz wouldn’t likely even see a V6. In fact, the concept was fitted with a 2.0L four-cylinder diesel engine pumping out 190 horsepower and 300 lb-ft of torque. (A 2.2L four-cylinder diesel, standard in the Hyundai Santa Fe across the pond, generates 194 horsepower and 311 lb-ft of torque.) It’s what the truck market’s been missing, Santa Cruz proponents will say. The reason trucks account for 14% of U.S. auto sales now, down from 19% in 2004, is because truly small pickups like the Ford Ranger and Subaru Baja are dead and buried.

After all, Americans will likely register more than 2.5 million new pickup trucks in 2015. If Americans could buy 670,000 non-full-size pickups this year as they did in 2004 (rather than the 380,000 they’re likely to), pickups would be just as common now as they were then. If only they could buy them, say the supporters of truly small trucks, they would. The buyers are out there, if only there was a product that suited them to a tee. Not a nearly-full-size truck like the new Colorado, but a truck that’s more suitable for weekend fun than it is for week-long work.

They may be right. Hyundai Motor America boss of product planning, Mike O’Brien, believes the Santa Cruz could do Tucson-like sales volume in the United States. That won’t provide the crazy full-size figures of the Ford F-Series or even GMC’s Sierra, but Hyundai averaged 46,300 annual Tucson sales over the last four years. In a market that’s eating up high-riding vehicles, Hyundai is a car-focussed company that could certainly use another 46,000 sales from its “light truck” portfolio.

DOUBTERS LINE UP


But, naysayers point out, isn’t 46,000 a big number for a small truck in an America that loves full-size pickups?

Subaru sold 33,132 Outback-based Bajas in total over more than five years. True, the Subaru of 2002 was not the force that Subaru is now, but the Baja is as much a comparable historical vehicle with the Santa Cruz as there is. You can also consider the Honda Ridgeline: like the Hyundai concept, the Ridgeline isn’t a body-on-frame vehicle, but it was sold by a large automaker with proven underpinnings. The Ridgeline’s best sales year: 2006, when 50,193 were sold. But even during its healthiest span of time, between 2005 and 2007, Honda averaged only 45,000 annual Ridgeline sales.

Indeed, other automakers have considered the idea and set it aside. Remember the Dodge Rampage Concept, the GMC Denali XT Concept, and the Toyota A-Bat Concept? They didn’t make it, and the business case likely had an awful lot to do with it.

MURANO CC OR OUTBACK?


Depending on your perspective, history is either firmly on the Santa Cruz’s side or completely against it. As presented in Detroit, the Hyundai Santa Cruz undoubtedly is not like anything else. That’s a formula that buried the Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet but exalted the Subaru Outback.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 132 comments
  • TonyJZX TonyJZX on May 28, 2015

    I unashamedly like the look of that. However the pragmatist inside me says that the CUV version of that is much more practical and suitable for my lifestyle. I can use a little jacked up CUV. I love the look of the little toy Tonka truck but that stunted tray is pretty useless. I may have to shift a sofa or a 50" LCD or some drywall or a door and thats where a CUV with the seats folded down makes sense. This CLEARLY does not.

  • Spartan Spartan on May 28, 2015

    Well, I'm sure Kia Bongo / Hyundai Porter owners in Korea would like something a bit nicer. Oh yea, Ssangyong Actyon Sports owners would probably want something a little nicer as well :)

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next