New York 2015: 2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club Unveiled

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

For those looking for a track-day special that can driven to the track, the 2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club just might be what you need.

Performance upgrades found in the Club model include limited-slip differential, Bilstein shocks, and shock tower brace, but only if one opts for the six-speed manual. Those who choose the six-speed auto will only have 17-inch gunmetal wheels, front air dam and rear lip spoilers going for them.

An additional package — pulling from the MX-5 Global Cup race car — adds Brembo brakes, functional side aero, and swaps the standard wheels for 17-inch black BBS forged alloys.

Other features include Mazda Connect, seatback bars, and piano black side mirrors.

Pricing and other details will arrive closer to the MX-5 Miata’s showroom debut this summer.

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
32 of 38 comments
  • See 7 up See 7 up on Apr 01, 2015

    Barring physical handicap, those that choose the automatic club edition should also be publicly ridiculed.

    • See 2 previous
    • Mnm4ever Mnm4ever on Apr 01, 2015

      @duffman13 yes i did, thanks!

  • Czilla9000 Czilla9000 on Apr 01, 2015

    There is a problem, though, with the auto/manual sigma for people like me: I'd love to own a Miata, but don't know how to drive stick. I don't have a friend with a manual who can show me. I've looked to see if driving schools in the area offer manual training and they don't. But I'd feel ridiculous driving Miata with automatic....which means I guess a Miata ain't in my future. So - even if people really would prefer a manuals - if there is no one willing to show us how we can't get one. I think that's part of the reason why manual sales are so bad with Millennials. I also think this is why sports car companies are ditching manuals in favor of DCT-only or auto only: They know they're customers might feel ridiculous driving a non-stick sports car but yet they may not know how to drive stick. Only offering a DCT eliminates the sigma - "Oh ya, I would have bought the stick version, but don't you know they don't offer it." Dignity saved, lol.

    • See 16 previous
    • MBella MBella on Apr 01, 2015

      @Splorg McGillicuddy A stick beater is the way to go. Something that runs and is at $1000 or less. Drive it for a few months, and then sell it. A Ranger can fit the bill very well.

  • Fordson Fordson on Apr 01, 2015

    Anyone learning to drive stick needs to know about how gear reduction trades speed for power, and vice versa, about engine power and torque curves, about THEIR engine's power and torque curves, how to match revs and downshift, etc. I know too many people who know how to get a car started from rest, and to go up through the gears, and some idea that they need to downshift when slowing for curves, intersections, etc., but no real idea how to shift to extract the appropriate performance for the kind of driving they're doing. These folks are a hazard - they're in the merge lane on an entrance ramp trying to find a hole, and because they're doing 60 they're already in top gear and they're staying there. They can't pass anyone on a two-lane road. They ride the brakes all the way down a long steep hill, in top gear. Even if you removed the clutch from the equation, they would still drive a DSG in manual mode the same way. The actual mechanics of smooth clutch engagement are the least of their problems. Rather than send these folks out to practice clutch engagement, I would send them out with an automatic and tell them to mix up their driving environments, and watch the tach-pay attention to what the transmission is doing, closely, for like a week.

    • See 4 previous
    • Internet Commenter Internet Commenter on Apr 01, 2015

      @319583076 I recall reading that the 2.0 will be tuned to deliver a different power band than what's offered in the 3 and CX-5. I believe it was in a Mazda press release. However, it didn't specify exactly what the curve would look like. Perhaps this will be significant?

  • Notapreppie Notapreppie on Apr 01, 2015

    Adding non-adjustable Bilsteins seems like a wasted effort. I don't get why they bother upgrading the dampers. Most serious drivers (even half-serious autocrossers, like myself) just replace them with adjustable KYBs or Konis (or, if you have money, Motons or Penskes).

    • See 2 previous
    • Duffman13 Duffman13 on Apr 02, 2015

      Non-adjustable bilsteins are some of the best dampers on the market, and can be easily revalved if one has the inclination and knows a good shock builder. As mono-tubes they can take a hell of a lot more abuse than twin tube Konis or *shudder* KYBs. As a half serious driver/autocrosser/track rat, I'd rather have a matched spring/shock setup that works designed by a team of automotive engineers. $600 is better spent on track time than throwing money at new dampers if you want to be faster for 99% of the performance driving population anyway. Adjustability for adjustability's sake just adds one more variable to why I'm not going as fast as I want to. Aside from a bit of feel most drivers don't know what the fastest settings for a particular course are anyway, so they're more likely to negatively impact the handling than anything else. lastly, I'm to old for coilovers in a car that I drive on the street. Yeah, they're nice on track, but unless I'm over a 50/50 split, it just doesn't sit well with me.

Next