TTAC's Greatest Hits: The Ephemeral Nature Of Luxury

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

The announcement of the Apple Watch caused a resurgent interest in Jack’s piece on luxury watches, luxury cars and the disposable nature of both. Although the article is over two years old, it’s gained a new life with today’s news. Check it out here.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 45 comments
  • Energetik9 Energetik9 on Mar 10, 2015

    Maybe I'm in the minorty on TTAC, but I'll be placing an order for an iWatch. I like what I see so far. I realize there are limitations, but it's a watch, not a phone. I'm also the owner of a few luxury swiss watches. Not sure how much I'll wear the iWatch, but at the lower price points, it's not that expensive. I see zero reason for a gold version.

  • Zamoti Zamoti on Mar 10, 2015

    I don't see the appeal in this at all. It's not really a watch and that's fine because nobody needs a watch these days. I have a clock in the corner of my laptop display, a phone on my pocket with the time, my desk telephone also shows the time. The watch as a timekeeping device has long been obsolete. What a watch has turned into in modern times is a form of adornment. Some say it can be an ostentatious show of wealth or an attempt at it, some say that it's about enjoying a piece of timeless craftwork and/or jewelery (if you buy a nice one). I tend to believe that it is indeed about the enjoyment of the piece itself; I do not own a timepiece currently, but I do look forward to eventually collecting a few. I don't care tremendously about what others think since most people won't notice it and will probably prefer some gadget strapped to their wrist instead. I desire a well-made watch because I value well-made objects. I try to keep personal belongings to a minimum and what I do acquire, I tend to make sure is important to me as well as extremely durable. A computer for my wrist doesn't qualify, not because it won't be well made, but because it won't stand the test of time. It will be disposable, no different than a mobile phone or a laptop. It will never appreciate in value, it will never be handed down the generations. I presume that this is 100% fine with many, I don't presume to foist my values upon others, but I certainly don't agree with adding more disposable electronic folderol to the litany of things that distract us from our lives. On the enjoyable day that I do find my timepiece, I will look at it, see something durable and good, I will know the time, tuck it back under my cuff and then I will happily continue upon my way. I don't need a watch to tell me that I'm too fat, I know this already.

  • Zackman Zackman on Mar 10, 2015

    I'm not an Apple-head, so I won't be buying one. My 1991 $50.00 Helbros wristwatch w/Twist-o-flex band works just fine! Just change the battery every year. If I want more bling, I wear my 2005 Citizen Eco-Drive watch. It's a pure watch - no day/date, just a watch. If I really want to impress someone, I'll get out the white gold 1914 Elgin railroad watch my great uncle wore when he worked for Missouri Pacific RR. However, if anyone wants to buy the Apple watch, more power to them!

    • S2k Chris S2k Chris on Mar 10, 2015

      "If I want more bling, I wear my 2005 Citizen Eco-Drive watch. It’s a pure watch – no day/date, just a watch." I have an Eco-Drive as well, and to me it's the Mazda Miata of watches. I wear it every day, it's durable as hell, most people think it cost more than it did (listed for $600, bought in a department store for ~$300), and it will run forever with minimal effort. The iWatch is cool, and if it was $100-200 I'd probably pick one up and play with it for a few months, but at the asking prices, it's way too much for something I know won't be a long-term thing.

  • Zamoti Zamoti on Mar 10, 2015

    Relevant: ca[.]askmen[.]com/fashion/mens-watches/against-smart-watches.html

Next