Elio Motors Dyno Tests Engine Prototype

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

Elio Motors, the startup automaker hoping to produce and sell a low cost, high mileage reverse trike announced yesterday that the prototype of the IAV designed 0.9 liter, three cylinder single overhead cam engine to be used in their vehicle has successfully started dynamometer testing. A short video of the engine running in a test cell has also been released. While it remains to be seen if Elio will be able to raise the $200 million or so they say they need to start production in 2016 (pushed back from this year), the engine test is one of the more important steps on the journey to reach that goal.

While no horsepower or torque figures have been released, Elio Motors founder and CEO, Paul Elio, expressed satisfaction with the initial testing. “We are extremely pleased with our first run on the dynamometer,” Elio said. “Seeing this new technology come to fruition has been one of the most exciting stages in our history. This prototype puts us right were we need to be at this stage of development.”

Considering how many existing car companies are making or developing three cylinder engines with about one liter of displacement, many have questioned why Elio Motors isn’t just buying an off the shelf motor from another company, particularly since the company has publicized how they plan to keep costs and prices low by using many components already being produced by automotive suppliers along with more bespoke parts like their engine. Paul Elio addressed that question in the company’s announcement. “We are literally trying to reinvent the auto industry, so why go the conventional route and rework someone else’s engine? There really was nothing available that combined the speed and power that we want and our customers deserve.”

That’s an interesting comment because at 55 horsepower, the Elio engine makes less than half the power of Ford’s one liter Ecoboost triple, though the Ecoboost is, of course, turbocharged. Previously, Elio Motors indicated to TTAC that Comau, which is doing Elio’s production engineering and automation at GM’s former Shreveport, LA factory where Elio hopes to maker their trike, has reserved an assembly station on the engine line for the installation of a possible turbocharger.

Paul Elio’s remarks are also interesting because IAV is indeed more or less reworking the design of the Suzuki triple most familiar to Americans as the engine in the Geo Metro. That’s the same engine that Elio Motors has been using in their prototype mules, like the one I test drove last summer. I suppose Paul’s entitled to some wiggle room on his statement because although the Elio 0.9 liter engine is ultimately based on the Suzuki architecture, and while Elio initially did consider putting the Suzuki motor back into production, they determined that it simply was not a modern enough design to meet their objectives and the engine has been redesigned. All of the major engine components were designed specifically for Elio by IAV, including the cylinder block, cylinder head, valve cover, front cover, oil pan, crankshaft, camshaft, valve train, pistons, connecting rods, bearings and water pump.

TTAC has asked Elio Motors about the actual horsepower and torque results from the testing and we’ll publish them if and when we get them.

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can get a parallax view at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options. Thanks for reading – RJS


Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 20 comments
  • Jgwag1985 Jgwag1985 on Mar 09, 2015

    Paul Elio plays both sides of the fence. Nothing (engine) met our needs, yet he went to OE's for engines. .......Posters here blame the OE's for high cost(on engine, need to design their own). Couldn't Elio negotiate a deal to build the OE engine themselves. Couldn't figure out a licensing agreement? As an All-In depositor, I am thoroughly disgusted with Paul Elio and his lies, and the total wack jobs at the Elio forums that continue to support Elio....The theories they come up with, it's big oil, the automakers trying to kill it. They can sell at $6800 because they will sell CAFE credits. Makes me wonder if Paul Elio really had an engineering firm, and why did it go out of business? Was it the economy, the inability to meet a deadline, or poor engineering? I had high hopes (totally misguided, I will admit too) about this being built. Now I just want the whole saga over. End it now, quit dangling the carrot with no chance of getting it. No big press conference for this engine with all the potential investors or even Paul Elio in the background? So they delayed this(unveiling) for a month because??

    • See 4 previous
    • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Mar 10, 2015

      @Jgwag1985 That's what I was told, and I'm pretty sure that I published that a while ago, but it's not mutually exclusive with rescheduling to impress investors.

  • Baconator Baconator on Mar 10, 2015

    There are many folks reading TTAC who work in automotive engineering and it would be great to hear from you. It seems vanishingly unlikely to me that a custom-designed engine would possibly, under any circumstances, be a cost effective solution - can anyone confirm or deny? Having read many interviews of the CEOs of small manufacturers, it seems like the lessons are always (1) lease rather than build your factory (Delorean, Weismann) and (2) avoid making your own engines (TVR and Cizeta, or on the more successful side of this choice, Tesla, Lotus, Hennessy, Maruti, Pagani). If you ignore these two lessons, the only path to success is to start as part of a well-capitalized and patient manufacturing conglomerate (Hyundai/Kia, Subaru, Proton, Tata). I continue to think that there is untapped demand for an Elio-style "car," but I'm scratching my head at Elio's management. Honestly, for a company with that many pre-orders to be unable to raise $200M in this free-flowing private equity market - and with Tesla as a comp, no less! - is not encouraging.

  • Dave M. IMO this was the last of the solidly built MBs. Yes, they had the environmentally friendly disintegrating wiring harness, but besides that the mechanicals are pretty solid. I just bought my "forever" car (last new daily driver that'll ease me into retirement), but a 2015-16 E Class sedan is on my bucket list for future purchase. Beautiful design....
  • Rochester After years of self-driving being in the news, I still don't understand the psychology behind it. Not only don't I want this, but I find the idea absurd.
  • Douglas This timeframe of Mercedes has the self-disintegrating engine wiring harness. Not just the W124, but all of them from the early 90's. Only way to properly fix it is to replace it, which I understand to be difficult to find a new one/do it/pay for. Maybe others have actual experience with doing so and can give better hope. On top of that, it's a NH car with "a little bit of rust", which means to about anyone else in the USA it is probably the rustiest W124 they have ever seen. This is probably a $3000 car on a good day.
  • Formula m How many Hyundai and Kia’s do not have the original engine block it left the factory with 10yrs prior?
  • 1995 SC I will say that year 29 has been a little spendy on my car (Motor Mounts, Injectors and a Supercharger Service since it had to come off for the injectors, ABS Pump and the tool to cycle the valves to bleed the system, Front Calipers, rear pinion seal, transmission service with a new pan that has a drain, a gaggle of capacitors to fix the ride control module and a replacement amplifier for the stereo. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket. The front end got serviced in year 28. On the plus side blank cassettes are increasingly easy to find so I have a solid collection of 90 minute playlists.
Next