By The Time I Get To Tuscon…

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

First, there was the five-seat Santa Fe, which in GLS V6 form was the ride of choice for our very own Bark M. back in the day. Then the Santa Fe went upmarket, so Hyundai created the Tuscon. Now the Tuscon is, apparently, going upmarket. It’s like what Chrysler did with Imperial, only in reverse!

The Sonata Eco 1.6L turbo powertrain is likely to be offered here in the United States; it’s a safe bet that the 2.4L NA four will also be available, most likely as the default.

As you can see, it looks very nice inside and out. Reports of ventilated seats might be for the Euro market only; their Elantra, for example, is available with more stuff than ours. Expect the new Tuscon to offer a 1982 Civic 1500GL’s worth of interior space at only twice the weight. We’ll have a chance to see it in the metal come the New York show in April.

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 58 comments
  • Magnusmaster Magnusmaster on Feb 17, 2015

    The design of this new Tucson is a huge step down from the current down, particularly in the rear. Peter Schreyer is doing a great job on Kia, but he's completely ruining Hyundai.

    • See 1 previous
    • Ect Ect on Feb 18, 2015

      I agree with mkirk, but this is a subjective topic. I found it amusing when we carshopped in 2013 that the Hyundai people were quick to brag about the company having hired a head designer from BMW, and the Kia people bragged about the company having hired a head designer from Audi. True to form, the Hyundais were very busy, bulky designs (to my eye), while the Kias were sleeker. The Kias also drove much better than the Hyundais. As one example, the Tucson of the day only offered the 2.4 engine, while the Sportage could be had with the 2.0 turbo. What a difference that made! The Sportage also had much better handling, and a better range of options. We almost bought it. So, our verdict was that Kia got the better German designer. It seems that Hyundai brass came to the same conclusion, although it took them considerably longer to do so. ANOTHER company that could have saved themselves time and/or made a better business decision by hiring me - but didn't. Alas!

  • AnotherMillenial AnotherMillenial on Feb 17, 2015

    I think this Tuscon looks great, easily better-looking than anything else in it's segment, interior or exterior. From a visual standpoint '16 Mazda CX-5 comes in second, honorable mention to the Rav4's interior. Meanwhile, the Chevy Equinox looks (more or less) exactly the same.

  • Lorenzo Yes, they can recover from the Ghosn-led corporate types who cheapened vehicles in the worst ways, including quality control. In the early to mid-1990s Nissan had efficient engines, and reliable drivetrains in well-assembled, fairly durable vehicles. They can do it again, but the Japanese government will have to help Nissan extricate itself from the "Alliance". It's too bad Japan didn't have a George Washington to warn about entangling alliances!
  • Slavuta Nissan + profitability = cheap crap
  • ToolGuy Why would they change the grille?
  • Oberkanone Nissan proved it can skillfully put new frosting on an old cake with Frontier and Z. Yet, Nissan dealers are so broken they are not good at selling the Frontier. Z production is so minimal I've yet to see one. Could Nissan boost sales? Sure. I've heard Nissan plans to regain share at the low end of the market. Kicks, Versa and lower priced trims of their mainstream SUV's. I just don't see dealerships being motivated to support this effort. Nissan is just about as exciting and compelling as a CVT.
  • ToolGuy Anyone who knows, is this the (preliminary) work of the Ford Skunk Works?
Next