Editorial: Subaru Is Proof That Boring Sells

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

2014 was a banner year for Subaru. The Japanese auto maker sold a record 500,000 units in the United States. Capacity is bursting at the seams – Subaru simply cannot meet demand without their upcoming expansion at their Indiana plant, and they had to kick the Toyota Camry out just to be able to build more cars. One industry source told us that in terms of pure retail sales (fleet, daily rental etc excluded) Subaru beat Hyundai – who would have imagined that even 5 years ago.

Subaru’s lineup is also more “boring” than ever. There are no more manual Outbacks, no more WRX hatchbacks, no turbocharged Legacy models, no more pure wagons. In short, none of the products that make enthusiasts adore the brand. I don’t think it matters.

Outside of a small pocket of New England states, Subaru has perennially struggled to gain a proper foothold in the marketplace. In the epilogue to the seminal marketing book Where The Suckers Moon, the author notes that after a repeated series of mis-steps in terms of both product and marketing, Subaru finally scored a hit with the Outback – in 1995.

It’s taken roughly another 15 years for their lineup of visually bland, mechanically quirky all-wheel drive cars to gain serious traction (no pun intended) outside of the Yankees-and-alternative-lifestyle crowd, and be taken seriously as a mainstream alternative to the Camcords and EsCR-V’s.

The big winners in 2014, in terms of sales were products that were designed to broaden the brand’s appeal to American consumers: the Impreza, Forester, Crosstrek and Outback, which have all undergone some form of commodification to scrub performance variants, manual transmissions and other idiosyncrasies from their lineup. Sales of the Forester were up 29 percent, the Outback up 18. Even the Legacy, the car which has arguably lost most of what once made it cool (turbo engines, stick shifts, wagons) is up 24 percent. Even the new WRX and STI posted a 42 percent gain in sales, despite not having the beloved hatchback body style. The big losers are the low volume BRZ and the aging Tribeca.

Clearly, the new direction is working. Part of that comes down to Subaru’s shrewd positioning in the post-recession era, where its relatively quirky image, standard all-wheel drive, safety-focused marketing campaigns and competitive prices made it attractive not just to consumers who may have bought a mainstream brand, but those who wanted something off-beat, but no longer saw the value in a foreign luxury brand. My parents are a good example of this. They now have a Volvo XC60 T6, but won’t be buying another one, thanks to a series of price increases by Volvo. The new Outback is high on their list. Are they upset about the demise of the turbo engines? No, but not for reasons you think. Says Mum: “We had a GL 10 Turbo and loved it. But when the turbo died, we sold it. It will be nice not to have to worry about that anymore.” Yes, the plural of anecdote isn’t data, but last year alone gave us half a million data points to examine. Pretty convincing numbers if you ask me.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 141 comments
  • Rcousine Rcousine on Jan 08, 2015

    Cain recently posted about Impreza/WRX/STi sales, and it struck me that some rather large proportion, like 1/4 or 1/5 of all US Impreza sales were owned by one of the performance models. That seems really high, and belies the argument that boring sells, at least in that part of the market. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that whatever proportion of the sales they make up, the WRX and WRX+ make up much or most of the net margin, too. So selling turbo AWD compacts is a really, really good business for Subaru, regardless of how boring Derek thinks the Subaru sales message has become.

    • Suto Suto on Jan 08, 2015

      Huge spoiler or no, the current Impreza looks like a 14 year old Corolla that got stung by a several bees. Going with this article, I have way too many opinions on why Subaru used to be a more interesting company. My friends and family are sick of hearing them. However, I am the kind of guy who will buy a used car for $3000 dollars and drive it for seven years. I have no plans on buying a new car in the foreseeable future. For that reason, my opinion DOES NOT MATTER to Subaru, Toyota, Ford, etc. They would be dumb to listen to me, because I am not buying a new car anyway.

  • -Nate -Nate on Jan 09, 2015

    I looked at the Forester and it makes sense to me , were I to need a new car ~ roomy , I could lay a rubber mat in the back area to carry my tools and boxes of old parts , I bet I could carry a Motocycle in there if I took the wheels off . I do think it looks pretty stodgy but that's the market they built it for , non ? . -Nate

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I will drive my Frontier into the ground, but for a daily, I'd go with a perfectly fine Versa SR or Mazda3.
  • Zerofoo The green arguments for EVs here are interesting...lithium, cobalt and nickel mines are some of the most polluting things on this planet - even more so when they are operated in 3rd world countries.
  • JMII Let me know when this a real vehicle, with 3 pedals... and comes in yellow like my '89 Prelude Si. Given Honda's track record over the last two decades I am not getting my hopes up.
  • JMII I did them on my C7 because somehow GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. These are brighter then OEM despite the smoke tint look.I got them here: https://www.corvettepartsandaccessories.com/products/c7-corvette-oracle-concept-sidemarker-set?variant=1401801736202
  • 28-Cars-Later Why RHO? Were Gamma and Epsilon already taken?
Next