What Can The Second Q7 Do For Audi In America?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Sales of the Audi Q7 in 2014 rose to a seven-year high in the United States. That’s a meaningful bit of information right there, given that the Q7 at your local Audi dealer now is basically the Q7 that first arrived at your local Audi dealer in 2006.

North of the border, Canadians registered more new Q7s in the first eleven months of 2014 than in any previous full calendar year. Q7 sales in both Canada and the United States have increased in each of the last five years.

It’s by no means the highest-volume player in the luxury SUV world, not in 2007 when U.S. Q7 volume peaked at 20,695 units; not in 2014 when the Q7 is outsold by low-volume premium brand utility vehicles like the BMW X1, Lexus GX460, and Volvo XC60. (Would the Q7 sell more often if Audi added the letter X to its badge? Probably not. Maybe. Definitely.)

But what impresses about the Q7 is not the number of sales, rather that the totals increase as the vehicle ages. Audi’s four rings have presented numerous vehicles with opportunities for growth late in their lifecycles. Q5 volume, for example, has only ever increased, from 13,790 units in 2009 to 23,518 in 2010, 24,908 in 2011, 28,671 in 2012, 40,355 in 2013, and possibly more than 42,000 in 2014, its sixth year on the market.

The expansion of the U.S. new vehicle market has assisted, as well. 2013 volume across the industry rose 7.5%. Through the first eleven months of 2014, sales are up 5.5%. The utility vehicle sector is up nearly 12% this year. But growth in the overall industry does not assure all vehicles of increased sales year after year after year on the back of nothing more than modest updates and upgrades. Otherwise, we wouldn’t see decreased sales in 2014 from the Mazda CX-9, Lincoln MKT, Infiniti QX70, Honda Pilot, Volkswagen Tiguan, Toyota Sequoia, BMW X1, Ford Edge, Nissan Armada, Nissan Pathfiner, GMC Acadia, Kia Sorento, Volvo XC60, Cadillac SRX, Volkswagen Touareg and numerous others, many of which, like the Q7, are aging vehicles about to be replaced.

The Q7, however, is part of the scorching hot Audi brand. With one month remaining, 2014 was already the fifth consecutive year of record sales at Audi. The brand set U.S. sales records in 47 consecutive months through November. Brand-wide sales are up 15% this year, a gain of 21,725 units through eleven months. In November, when the industry grew at a 5% clip, Audi sales shot up 22% with help from new products (A3, Q3) and solid growth from the Q5 (up 17%) and the Q7, which climbed 15%.

If Audi can expand its Q7 owner base with a model that’s seen two presidential and two mid-term election cycles come and go, what might the second-generation Q7 achieve? Audi’s gradual climb toward the top of the premium leaderboard continues. In the U.S., they’re outselling Cadillac and Acura this year, something Audi couldn’t do in 2013.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 70 comments
  • ZCD2.7T ZCD2.7T on Dec 29, 2014

    The Q7 still sells because it still looks the way that Car and Driver described it way back when it was first introduced: "A concept car masquerading as an SUV". Even 8 years later, it still looks like nothing else on the road. I came thisclose to buying one in 2008, but ended up with an MDX instead. 2 primary reasons: 1) MDX drives smaller than it is, and has more interior space than you'd think. Q7 drove bigger than it is, with less space thank you'd think. 2) the 3.6L V-6 available at that time was LOUD - like "shout to be heard above it loud" and didn't make the car that quick. The 3.0L supercharged V-6 that's now offered is the perfect gasoline motor for the Q7 - much more refined, MUCH more powerful than the 3.6. The TDi, though is the one to get if you can afford it. The MDX has been great over 130K miles - bulletproof and fun to drive for an SUV. It's due for replacement in the Spring, and the new Q7 was the wife's presumptive favorite until she saw it. Now, seems like it will be between another MDX and the new Volvo XC90...

    • See 1 previous
    • ZCD2.7T ZCD2.7T on Dec 29, 2014

      @Mandalorian I know all about the 3.0T motor, as I get to enjoy it every day in my S4! I actually drove a loaner Q7 to the Acura dealership to test-drive the MDX - the Acura sales guys got a kick out of that! Price difference was bigger back then, too. Audi has added standard equipment to the various Q7 trim levels while at the same time Acura raised the "loaded" pricing substantially on the 2014 and newer MDX, so now they're pretty comparable. I agree with you that the new MDX is excellent overall...

  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Dec 29, 2014

    The current Q7 has always looked a bit outdated to me, and like it has far too much metal heft riding on the wheels. The wheels which are buried under a floppy blanket of metal. The equivalent Touareg was/is far superior looking.

  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
Next