Is Scion's Next New Car A Station Wagon?
The death of the Toyota Matrix will leave a hatchback-sized hole in Toyota’s lineup. But the replacement won’t be a Toyota, if Scion’s newest concept is any indication.
As we reported back in June, Scion is said to be readying a new hatchback based on the Toyota Auris. The Auris is a European version of the Corolla, which features an independent rear suspension, rather than the Corolla’s torsion beam setup. The new vehicle will apparently be dubbed the Scion iM, and will debut in lightly disguised “concept” form at next month’s Los Angeles Auto Show.
Some time ago, our own Ronnie Schreiber g ot a chance to drive both the Auris hatchback (akin to the Matrix) and the Auris Touring Sports, which is a true station wagon variant. Will Scion be bold enough to bring the wagon version here? We’ll find out next month.
More by Derek Kreindler
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
- Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
- 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
- AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
- MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Comments
Join the conversation
On my second Nissan cube. (cue the derision concerning looks). Probably will be driving them for as long as they make them. Over 30mpg and carries just about anything. First one was a six speed and we would still be driving it if the wife hadn't boogered up her clutch knee. The roofline looks higher than it is and we get in and out comfortably. Our joints are "limed up" at 71 years but we do ok. Don't understand the fuss. I suspect the manufacturers would try a few low volume models and see who would buy them if the govt had not made it a pain to get them certified. The cars are all so much better than they were 25-30 years ago that I think some of the assumptions we make about them and their business models are probably wrong. I sure don't know why it took so long for them to decide to import my little box and I don't know why more people don't buy them. And yes, there are a lot of Gangstas with xB boxes here in Texas. Not so many cubes and souls which are pretty much the same car (appearance only).
@ petezeiss I would love to have it be higher as well. My first one loosened the front chin mount and the attachment to the right front fender by going through a wide ditch. The other complaint is that with the CVT, the payload is just over 800 lbs. Three fat friends and I will hit that. No luggage racks or trailer hitches or the warranty is voided. What it does very well is provide comfortable transportation for up to four people. Excellent back seat room with no loss of front room. The CVT took almost no getting used to. In town, none at all. On the highway I sense that the braking effect of an automatic is diminished by the CVT. I just prefer a stick. I have the torso of a pretty large person and a 29inch inseam so the seats are the right height. A body that was made for work and not for buying "off the rack". Getting into and out of my 4runner is much more difficult for me. I I thought the 6 speed cube we had before was just about perfect. Then my wife needed work on her left knee and still finds a clutch a challenge. She could drive anything I could before that and, in fact, picked out the car with the clutch. We drove it 85k with zero problems. Now have about 45 on this one. They are absolutely dependable. I don't live in snow country (SE Texas) so the height is unimportant. I would pick a cube or a versa as a good car for a person who was getting older and did not need mechanical repairs very often. It is easy to get into and/or out of. I think adapting from an automatic trannie into a CVT is very easy. Go rent a versa and pretend it has a higher roof as the power train is essentially the same. Btw, I think neither is a penalty box but no need to get into a peeing contest with the fanbois. I'm just enjoying passing most of the gas stations I see.