By on October 9, 2014

450x300x2014-Jeep-Wrangler-Sport-Afar-450x300.jpg.pagespeed.ic.X8fLQh_60a

After unwinding their Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing loan program in 2011, the Department of Energy is bringing it back. According to The Detroit News, the focus of this round will be on suppliers, as well as lightweight vehicle technology.

Despite the stated focus on suppliers, the timing of the announcement comes as FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne raised the idea of an aluminum Jeep Wrangler as a way of helping the venerable SUV meet increasing fuel economy standards – while also claiming that retrofitting the Toledo, Ohio assembly plant for aluminum construction would be far too expensive.

With roughly $16 billion in unused funds, the ATVM program has plenty of cash to spare to help re-tool Toledo – or any number of facilities. But you can bet that Marchionne, shrewd operator that he is, will use the threat of pulling production from Toledo to leverage some funds from the program – if he’s not already using that as a scare tactic in upcoming negotiations with the UAW.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

18 Comments on “DOE Revives Loan Scheme For Auto Makers...”


  • avatar
    thelaine

    No prob. Plenty of money to go around. Make it rain.

    • 0 avatar
      Landcrusher

      We can solve anything by just printing cash! Feed the poor! Cure the sick! The only thing standing in our way is hate!

      Hope!

      • 0 avatar

        Investments are just that, investments now that will have hopefully have a much greater reward in the future and if not the money spent has a multiplier effect. It’s what made the US great. And the best welfare program is a job.

        • 0 avatar
          Landcrusher

          Really, that’s what made America great? Government investments?

          Once you go past the Constitution, there isn’t really much great about our government except that it has mostly been marginally less dreadful than most of the others.

          Every government dollar is the product of private individuals allowed to create and labor with as little bad government influence as possible.

          Government “investments” are rarely investments at all. We have now invested in so many lawyers and academics that all the great government accomplishments of yesteryear are nigh impossible today.

          And don’t give me any public education BS either. If education is so important for productive people why don’t we deport every illegal without a degree? How much do our southern neighbors spend educating our workers anyway? $500 a year?

          And jobs are crap. They are not in anyway desirable. What is desired is production, goods, pay checks, skill growth, etc. Jobs that don’t create these things except the check are worse than nothing at all.

          I could keep going but you can likely guess the rest.

          /Rant off

        • 0 avatar
          stuki

          Investments are fund disbursements made, where the one making them carries the loss if they fail. Robbing Peter to pay Paul, just because Paul had better access to TV screens and government officials than Peter, is not investing. It’s just robbing Peter to pay Paul. No matter what Paul and his campaign funded politicos may say on TV.

          • 0 avatar

            Who’s robbing who here if we are creating the money by loaning it to banks? And who cares anyway we’re not Greece or anything, we control the worlds main trading currency, and all the howls of runaway inflation since the black guy was elected president have not proven true at all.
            Spent the money, we’ll print more, everybody going to get laid.

          • 0 avatar
            highdesertcat

            Yup! Solyndra, A123 and Fiskars come to mind.

            Fund disbursements made where it was known before hand that there would be NO return on investment.

          • 0 avatar
            Landcrusher

            Crazy Larry has it right. Just print more. Nothing bad will happen to us. We aren’t those people.

  • avatar
    celebrity208

    Is there a different loan rate for the ATVM than what the suppliers/manufacturers could get directly from banks?

    • 0 avatar
      Landcrusher

      Often there is an advantage, but if you do the math, these programs will always fail to pass muster.

      It’s government or résumé math that always get used. Similar to research paper math, you get any result you want.

      If you take out the total cost of everyone involved in the process to create the program, apply for and approve the loans, supervise those people, cover expenses, etc. It’s going to be a loser. Don’t even bother with the morality or fairness issues.

      OTOH, it won’t be judged that way. It will be judged based on the interest being worth whatever gets accomplished over the total of the programs. While this is an appropriate way to judge venture capital (the value of the investors’ time is never considered in spite of them being worth a lot per hour), it’s a great lie when used on government programs.

      It’s the difference between charity and welfare on steroids. The reason private property and free markets work the best is because other people’s money isn’t used as well as personal resources and government money (and pretty much any mega institution’s funds) are quickly and easily wasted. The closer the money is to the owner, the more real it is, and will be used more effectively. The less attached to a particular person money is, the more it gets misused.

      This is why collectivism works much better in a family than in a community and not at all in a nation.

    • 0 avatar
      TW5

      Yes. Most of the first ATVM recipients were credit rated as junk. They received below-market rates, and some of them received financing they wouldn’t have otherwise received.

  • avatar
    JGlanton

    A few days ago I was at a ghost town in Colorado at 11,000 feet testing the off-road limits of my rental car when a Wrangler Limited Sahara pulls up. I ask him where they were from. Texas. I asked him if he towed that Wrangler all the way from Texas. He said that they drove it up and it was very nice. Brand new, right from the dealer lot to the journey. I asked him what kind of mileage he got on the trip. He said he got 19 at best, but going across TX with the air-conditioner on he got 17. Highway.

    They’re going to have to do a little more than add some aluminum to fix that.

    Anyway, now my wife wants one so we can do an off-road camping trip on the Continental Divide.

    • 0 avatar
      afedaken

      I was going to excoriate him for using AC, then I re-read and saw TX.

    • 0 avatar
      James2

      Aerodynamics. What’s the drag coefficient of a Wrangler? 0.50, 0.60 with the roof taken off? Then, I imagine the Jeep’s ‘trail-rated’ tires aren’t the slippery, Prius-type rubber. Weight is probably the least of the Jeep’s concerns. So, even if Marchionne went aluminum*, that’s probably just a third of the battle.

      *if he doesn’t know what to do NOW (given development times), maybe he is wearing too many hats.

    • 0 avatar
      Hummer

      They’d sell much more focusing on cost than battling an uphill battle making it fuel efficient.
      Put the diesel in it, or put the Hemi in it, but aluminum costs an the other MpG crap won’t fly with those buyer.

  • avatar
    redav

    Honestly, if it’s a loan program, and if it’s run by people who know what they’re doing, the program would pay for itself, and thus be perpetually sustainable.

    • 0 avatar
      Landcrusher

      You mean like a bank?

      How about we let the government do that with everything else while we are at it? Profit is just for the greedy after all, and capitalism is evil and terrible.

  • avatar
    RedStapler

    If you want to make a more fuel efficient Wrangler the 1st step is to shrink it back closer to its historical “normal” size. The current unlimited it quite the Fat F&*# of Jeeps.

    Take the TJ (97-06) Wrangler, give a a nice 2-2.5L Diesel with a 6-8 speed trans and you are already in the mid to high 20s for real world MPG.

    My KJ Liberty CRD would get 22-25 real world and it was a 4200lb pig.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lie2me: Lou, I said that back when he was elected, he doesn’t take a salary because he doesn’t see...
  • Lie2me: Yep, those rich blue states that keep the country afloat
  • Lou_BC: “Oh wow, a multi billionaire has been in court” For multiple sexual offences… Other than...
  • Lie2me: Well, Lou, since Trump is a compulsive liar and even though he said all those things they’re not true...
  • golden2husky: …What an ideal time to not bail out the sanctuary states that obliterated their budgets by giving...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber