Chart Of The Day: The 200 And A Decade Of Chrysler Group Midsize Car Sales
Through the first nine months of 2014, sales of the Chrysler 200 are down 27%. That’s to be expected, as the 200 was transitioning from Sebring-based (but Pentastar-powered!) fleet favourite to sleeker 2015 200 form. Granted, Toyota is transitioning from Camry to refreshed Camry and sales are up 5% this year, but that’s a somewhat invalid comparison for another day. Dodge Avenger volume is down 37% to 49,363 units in 2014, but again, this was an anticipated decline, as Chrysler Group has actually killed off the Avenger.
Jointly, the duo is down 31% to 124,505 units. For the third time, this is not a shocker. We expected a period of decreasing 200 volume, and we knew the Avenger’s drops were going to be severe.
The pair was down 14% to 12672 units, a loss of 2010 units. Is that a concern if the new car has greater potential for profit generation? Not at all. But the discounts are already piling up on the 2015 200, with a $2500 cash allowance being just the starting point.
Of course, Chrysler Group midsize car sales fluctuate wildly, and we could yet see a surge by year’s end. The accompanying chart shows nine-month U.S. sales totals over the last nine years.
More by Timothy Cain
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- EBFlex No they shouldn’t. It would be signing their death warrant. The UAW is steadfast in moving as much production out of this country as possible
- Groza George The South is one of the few places in the U.S. where we still build cars. Unionizing Southern factories will speed up the move to Mexico.
- FreedMike I'd say that question is up to the southern auto workers. If I were in their shoes, I probably wouldn't if the wages/benefits were at at some kind of parity with unionized shops. But let's be clear here: the only thing keeping those wages/benefits at par IS the threat of unionization.
- 1995 SC So if they vote it down, the UAW gets to keep trying. Is there a means for a UAW factory to decide they no longer wish to be represented and vote the union out?
- Lorenzo The Longshoreman/philosopher Eri Hoffer postulated "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and ends up as a racket." That pretty much describes the progression of the United Auto Workers since World War II, so if THEY are the union, the answer is 'no'.
Comments
Join the conversation
The 200 may be very good. The problem for Chrysler is that it will have to be followed up by a couple of generations of very good 200 models before the average buyer in this segment is going to give it a serious look...cash on the hood nonwithstanding. Chrysler's image wasn't destroyed over one model run and it won't be rebuilt over one. Buyers in this segment are likely the least emotional and will always opt for the safe choice. The Japanese are bland, but they are known quantities. It is a reasonable bet that based on years of data they will be reliable appliances. The Chrysler doesn't have this yet and won't for some time. Even if the 200 was an absolute home run, this segment is so tight that it isn't going to make serious inroads for some time. In my early car buying days the Detroit 3 were always advertising the car that had "finally caught the imports". I eventually purchased an import and haven't looked back. There are some products now I would give a look at but I doubt I'd plunk down cash unless those models are backed up by solid efforts, especially in the midsize sedan class where they are all pretty indistinguishable anyway. Bottom line, why buy this over an Accord. Are the wonderful leather seats enough to overcome my not too distant memory of slipping transmissions and other trademark Chrysler issues? not yet, but given time those memories will fade so long as new ones aren't created. Will Chrysler stick with it that long?
Pch101, nicely said. This renegade cant get here fast enough. Kill the twin step brothers and set the bar higher Chrysler, we all deserve it.