Tesla Loses $49.8 Million In Q1 2014, Panasonic On Board With Gigafactory

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Although Tesla reported a profit of $17 million on $713 million in revenue, their financials were reported using non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) figures. Which means that my current checking account, according to non-GAAP figures, is probably somewhere in the high seven figures.

Using GAAP numbers, Tesla lost nearly $49.8 million, on revenues of $620 million. Despite the loss, Tesla delivered 6,457 units, and expects to sell 35,000 Model S units this year. Tesla also announced that their Model X SUV will be delayed again, until 2015.

But the bad news was interrupted today by a major development for Tesla. Panasonic, a major supplier of battery cells to Tesla, signed a letter of intent regarding their new “Gigafactory” that will build lithium-ion batteries somewhere in the Southwestern United States.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 44 comments
  • Brianyates Brianyates on May 08, 2014

    jdash1972, you may be surprised to know that contrary to what you say about"Tesla stuck selling electric cars in a world without many chargers" there are in fact a great many chargers in place right now and the way Tesla are rapidly doing things there will be many more to come. At this time it is possible to drive a Tesla from L.A. to New York with adequate chargers available, also from L.A. to Vancouver, B.C.

    • See 2 previous
    • Fozone Fozone on May 08, 2014

      @Sigivald I don't know a single person who can afford a Tesla that would even consider driving from LA-NY -- in any car, ever. It just isn't a typical use case.

  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on May 08, 2014

    Companies with a complete product line can afford to have EVs as loss leaders. Tesla can't.

  • Kosmo Kosmo on May 09, 2014

    Am I missing the point of this article? Isn't reporting financial results in non-GAAP format a HUGE deal with the SEC? Or can Tesla just put an asterisk at the bottom of the spreadsheet stating "Oh, by the way, we do our figuring different from every other company, because, well, we're special, and everybody loves us"? Musk is a savvy guy. I suspect he has an exit strategy where within the next 3-5 years, he will be acquired by a Fortune 500 company. If not, Tesla will ultimately implode financially, as the market moves on to the next Cinderella Story.

    • Pch101 Pch101 on May 09, 2014

      The SEC filings (10K, 10Q) use GAAP. But Tesla also issues "shareholder letters" (or whatever they're called) a bit ahead of the 10Q and 10K, and those include the non-GAAP numbers. This gets the media and fans all abuzz about Tesla's claims of "profit," and nobody ends up paying attention to the SEC filings when they come out a few days later. Musk really knows how to work the media.

  • Jdash1972 Jdash1972 on May 10, 2014

    I neither want Tesla to succeed nor fail. I like the idea of electric cars and sophisticated and improving battery technology. I just don't think electric cars make a whole lot of sense with the world the way it is. I agree it's a niche vehicle. And I believe it's an extravagant expenditure that will be dumped by the owner when the paint no longer shines or the fashion changes. This company makes exactly one product, and it's trendy at the moment, but that will change. Lithium ion batteries last about 10 years, give or take, if you take care of them. Hopefully the price (not the cost) of those batteries will drop, but the drop will have to be significant and that hasn't happened yet. After 100k miles and 10 years, I wouldn't want to be holding the bag, and which one of you would? This car is likely to find itself in a scrap yard long before it's time and that is neither efficient, economical or "green".

Next