Junkyard Find: 1988 Chevrolet Sprint Electric Sport

by Murilee Martin

Published: April 8th, 2014

junkyard find 1988 chevrolet sprint electric sport

Now that it’s possible to buy electric cars that actually do what cars are supposed to do, we mustn’t forget the very lengthy era— say 1970 to just a few years ago— during which all manner of optimistic-yet-doomed companies converted various econoboxes into lead-acid-battery-based EVs. Every once in a while, I’ll spot the remains of such an EV at a junkyard; we saw a junked EVolve Electrics 1995 Geo Metro EV conversion last year, and now a different Denver yard has given us this ’88 Sprint “Electric Sport.”

The Sprint aka Cultus wasn’t a bad choice for an electric vehicle, being lightweight and cheap.

Electric motors are worth money, either as working motors or as sources of valuable scrap copper, so the one in this car is long gone.

The remnants of the battery tray may be seen in the rear cargo area.

Someone grabbed the no-doubt-modified instrument cluster, too.

Bonus points to anyone who can track down the company that built the Electric Sport Sprint!

#1980s #1988 #1988ChevroletSprint #1988SuzukiSwift #AlternativeFuel #AlternativeFuels #ChevroletSprint #Denver #DownOnTheJunkyard #ElectricCar #Suzuki #ElectricCars #SuzukiSwift #Junkyard #EVs #JunkyardFind #Sprint

Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 15 comments

Kinsha on Apr 10, 2014

Looks like your long gone instrument cluster near the battery tray.

Like Reply
Otmar Ebenhoech on Nov 07, 2022

Surprising to see my old Electric Sprint here, a bit worse for wear.
I converted it for a man in the San Juan Islands in 1991, and later got it for my own daily driver. Underpowered at about 25 HP and only a 45 mile range with 12 Optima YellowTop lead acid batteries, but it sure was efficient and fun to drive!
The Brusa AC drive was smooth, no shifting required and the trans was locked in 2nd gear, plenty of torque off the line. Charging to full probably took about 5 hours from empty.
I think it was the kicking "Wayland" stereo that really put it over the top with two 8" microsubs.
I sold it in 2003.
Good times!

1 Reply

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.