VW Considering Larger Pickup For U.S. Market

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

The Amarok may not be coming to the United States, but depending on the success of the General Motors’ twin midsize pickups, Volkswagen may re-enter the light-duty truck market with a product more suited to a U.S. audience.

Autoblog reports VW is mulling over the idea of bringing a truck to the U.S. market, though it may not be the Amarok popular around the world, according to VW Group head of powertrain development Dr. Heinz-Jakob Neußer:

We are just reworking our truck strategy, and this is part of thinking about it. But the Amarok fits not very well to the efforts of the market.

Speculation around the VW U.S. pickup include a revised Amarok or a separate U.S.-only model.

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 78 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Mar 06, 2014

    VWs are not very reliable. The Amarok is not a bad looking truck but why would you pay more for a much less reliable truck. I would much rather have a Tacoma, Frontier, or Colorado/Canyon. As for larger trucks DM would prefer something 50% larger than the current full size with a 500 horsepower V8 motor. Bigger is better, isn't that the American way even if you do not need something bigger? VW should not enter this market. If anything VW would be better to concentrate their resources on a competitive compact crossover with a diesel option.

  • Gglockster Gglockster on Mar 07, 2014

    A ten year 100K mile bumper to bumper warranty, and included service contract would be about the only way I would ever consider VW to have a reliable pickup. A diesel option would be nice. I can't see it happening. VW will either price it too high, or the reliability just won't be there. This is besides the fact that a VW dealer's service department has more fresh manure than a pickup bed can hold. They are more likely to go the Routan route and re-badge someone else's vehicle and piss off another generation of buyers with arrogant sales, poor service, and a corporate mentality that doesn't want to help existing customers. Just call 800-822-8987 and try and get them to actually DO something.

  • DenverMike DenverMike on Mar 07, 2014

    VW isn't stupid. Not the smartest, but a small truck offering would be devoured by the bottom end of the market. That's what American fleet, cheapskates and other rebate demanding bottom feeders do best. That's why Mazda, Mitsu and Isuzu ran screaming. VW is quite aware of this. Americans just don't take small trucks as seriously as other parts of the world do. And they don't have full-size trucks as the spoiler. The King Ranch of small trucks would get laughed out of the American market. But the high end has to subsidize the bottom end. It would be ridiculous to try to sell smaller trucks at higher prices than full-size MSRP, never mind after rebates. But that's what small truck OEMs are faced with. Full-size trucks offer tremendous value and resale than some cars can't match.

  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Mar 07, 2014

    Here are some comments and a link regarding the issues confronting VW with trying to realise a pickup truck market in the US. From what I've read VW is more seriously considering the Caddy in the small van segement. Here's a comment from a Ford (Dearborn) commercial executive in relation to the removal of the chicken tax. " Potentially, it could reanimate the cadaverous compact-pickup segment and open the door to imported trucks like the VW Amarok and global Ford Ranger. Doug Scott, the head of marketing for Ford’s truck division, puts it succinctly: “With the [current] tax, importing a compact pickup is a nonstarter.” Here's the link to substantiate my comments. So it's not only VW who see the chicken tax as a hinderance to developing and expanding the US pickup truck market. This would give Americans' a wider range of choice and increase competition. Which would translate into a better market. http://www.caranddriver.com/features/free-trade-cars-why-a-useurope-free-trade-agreement-is-a-good-idea-feature

    • See 2 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Mar 08, 2014

      @BAF0 - Small truck OEMs found a home in OZ and struck gold, because of the affluence and the only other choices are SUVs, vans, crossovers, besides just cars. Small trucks command a premium price in OZ and high end, luxury mid-size pickups are common. What's uncommon is the fleet, cheapskates and other rebate and huge incentive demanding bottom feeders that make up most of the small truck market in America. You need to ask yourself why Mitsu, Mazda, Isuzu and Ford, abandoned the American small truck market and set up shop in OZ. Not the same thing. Not even close.And just what do you think has changed since they ran screaming from the American market? Now America has even more choices competing for consumers. But despite all your small truck choices, Aussie consumers stick to the top 3 OEMs mostly. You could easily get by with just the top OEMs. American could use 12 choices in compact roadsters, I guess, but what would be the benefit for the other 9 OEMs that just get the scraps left by the top 3? But no OEM has ever had to pay 25% to import. It's too easy to ship the drivetrain separate and join them at landfall. That's how the Sprinters are done. And soon the Transit Connects. Plug and play, drive away. If a small truck global/import is meant to be here, and has a true calling, it would be here. VW is thinking 'Screw the American market', when it comes to small trucks. But do you really expect them to say that? What do you think Mazda and Mitusbishi's answer would be??? But what's VWs lame chicken excuse for not enriching the lives of American consumers with the Polo or Scirocco?

Next