Editorial: Marchionne Settles On Minivan Plant Location

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler
UPDATE: Mere minutes after our prior editorial was published Chrysler announced that they will be withdrawing their request for funding from the Canadian government, and“…confirmed its intention to begin to allocate to our Windsor, Ontario plant the development and industrialization of the next “people carrier” architecture (the so-called next minivan and derivatives)” We are awaiting a call from Chrysler to discuss the matter. In the mean time, y ou can read the official announcement here.The biggest news for North America’s auto industry was announced at Geneva, and it wasn’t a new product debut. According to Automotive News, FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne has decided on a location for the next assembly plant, and things aren’t looking great for the current plant in Windsor, Ontario.Claiming that the merger between Fiat and Chrysler “flattened the world out completely”, Marchionne reportedly dismissed the idea of national loyalty (Marchionne is a naturalized Canadian), telling reporters“…it will become evident over the next 24 to 48 hours that we have taken a position, and life will go on. I think the decision has been made. We’re in the position of finalizing the choice. We’re pretty well done.”Marchionne has been lobbying both the Ontario and Canadian federal government for a reported $700 million in funds, the single largest amount aside from Chrysler’s 2009 bailout package. Marchionne said that countries competing for auto production have an “…obligation to match and effectively equal what the competition is offering” in terms of subsidies, suggesting that both levels of government ought to offer competitive subsidies to keep the minivans in Windsor.For a country f 35 million people, this is unrealistic. Canada simply cannot compete with the handouts being offered by the United States and Mexico, which are de rigueur for any auto maker looking to set up a plant (or re-tool an existing one). A relatively high Canadian dollar also contributes to high labor costs, something that can easily be remedied by moving production to the southern United States (where it will be reduced to $14-$16 per hour, or roughly half of what it costs in Canada), or Mexico, where workers would earn just a few dollars per hour.Labor costs aside, Mexico is looking like the most appealing choice for the new vans. FCA has the capacity in Mexico to build the new vans, thanks to the Dodge Journey’s move to the Sterling Heights, Michigan plant, and the Fiat 500’s move to Poland. Along with NAFTA, Mexico has a free trade agreement with the European Union, allowing FCA to export cars to a broad range of markets. And with planned upgrades to a flexible line, this could mean anything from the new minivans to a crossover to a new sedan. The timing of the van’s launch also coincides with the end of Chrysler’s contract with Unifor (formerly the CAW), allowing them to make a clean break from Windsor.Assuming Chrysler does leave Windsor, it will herald the start of a painful, Australia-style exodus from Southern Ontario for the Detroit Three. GM’s Oshawa plant is almost certainly the next plant to close, which will devastate the working-class town that has built itself around GM. That will leave just one plant for each American OEM- the GM CAMI plant in Ingersoll, the Ford plant in Oakville and the FCA plant in Brampton as the sole remnants of Detroit’s Canadian automotive assembly sector. On the other hand, Ontario’s three non-unionized transplants, operated by Honda and Toyota, don’t appear to be going anywhere.
Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 60 comments
  • Dougjp Dougjp on Mar 04, 2014

    What is going on here? "Nope, won't take cheap millions because there's some political smell around but its a business (which presumably is about making money above all?) and we are going to use "our own money" that we don't really have and expand in Canada where we withdraw our request for almost-freebies? This is so confusing its ridiculous. Another take on it with some more details; http://business.financialpost.com/2014/03/04/chrysler-funding-ontario-plants/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FP_TopStories+%28Financial+Post+-+Top+Stories%29&utm_content=Netvibes

    • See 1 previous
    • Juicy sushi Juicy sushi on Mar 05, 2014

      @Lou_BC I think the governments may also have had some pushback in the sense of we already saved your ass once, why should assistance be an ongoing thing? The funds likely would have come with conditions, and should have. It's going to be a PR problem either way for FCA, and other industries in general over the next few years. The income inequality debate is just getting started, politically, and the responses taken may not be what people like Sergio will find favourable.

  • Bobman Bobman on Mar 04, 2014

    Hmmm, a lot of stories being posted about how the government was surprised that FCA "pulled away from the table", while it appeared that "Canadian government has been having good conversations with the company" and "Marchionne, who runs Fiat in what is arguably the most uncompetitive assembly environment in the world, accused Canada of being uncompetitive". Nothing like a great welcome from our politicians to private investors. I don't think anyone knows what's going on but, with this type of shit slinging, it's no wonder FCA stopped the negotiations. This is a terrible situation created by our politicians who are acting very bush-league at the moment. Hopefully this thing can be salvaged somehow.

    • Juicy sushi Juicy sushi on Mar 05, 2014

      Which level of government was slinging mud? Don't forget there are two levels of government involved. More to the point, perhaps Sergio noticed that the general public actually rather shared the sentiment, and that his demands would potentially hurt sales.

  • CanadaCraig My 2006 300C SRT8 weighs 4,100 lbs. The all-new 2024 Dodge Charge EV weighs 5,800 lbs. Would it not be fair to assume that in an accident the vehicles these new Chargers hit will suffer more damage? And perhaps kill more people?
  • Akila Hello Everyone, I found your blog very informative. If you want to know more about [url=
  • Michael Gallagher I agree to a certain extent but I go back to the car SUV transition. People began to buy SUVs because they were supposedly safer because of their larger size when pitted against a regular car. As more SUVs crowded the road that safety advantage began to dwindle as it became more likely to hit an equally sized SUV. Now there is no safety advantage at all.
  • Probert The new EV9 is even bigger - a true monument of a personal transportation device. Not my thing, but credit where credit is due - impressive. The interior is bigger than my house and much nicer with 2 rows of lounge seats and 3rd for the plebes. 0-60 in 4.5 seconds, around 300miles of range, and an e-mpg of 80 (90 for the 2wd). What a world.
  • Ajla "Like showroom" is a lame description but he seems negotiable on the price and at least from what the two pictures show I've dealt with worse. But, I'm not interested in something with the Devil's configuration.
Next