UAW Money Woes Worry Detroit Three

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

With declining membership and fees paired with a defeat in a close election recently held at Volkswagen’s plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., the Detroit Three fear the United Auto Workers not only have no future, but their replacement would bring back the days of turmoil settled over a decade before.

The Detroit Free Press reports the three Detroit automakers worry the UAW could be absorbed by another, more hostile union not as willing to keep labor costs competitive with overseas competitors, as well disrupting the brokered peace which set lower wages for new hires and health care concessions that brought United States production costs on parity with Japan.

Meanwhile, the UAW continues to weaken, as annual dues fell by 40 percent to $115 million over the period between 2006 and 2012 with membership falling by 30 percent to 382,000 in the same period, having peaked at 1.5 million members in 1979. The union’s assets totaled $1 billion in 2012, making the UAW the wealthiest union the U.S., though $300 million in assets were liquidated in the six-year period to pay operating expenses while spending was cut 15 percent; $47 million in assets were sold in the last year alone to balance the union’s budget. Further, with lower wages from new workers unable to fill the coffers fast enough to make up the difference, the UAW may raise dues for the first time in 47 years.

In UAW president Bob King’s view, the union has no future without an organized South, where transplants such as VW and BMW have expanded in the region over the past decade as more and more factories in and around Detroit closed. King’s potential successor, secretary-treasurer Dennis Williams, has vowed to fight on, from higher wages for new hires to more organization battles in the South; the UAW recently filed an appeal with the National Labor Relations Board over the outcome of the Volkswagen vote.

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
13 of 87 comments
  • Stanczyk Stanczyk on Feb 26, 2014

    They dont know yet that the moment they will 'escape' from union boss control...they'll be ripped by their 'new' greedy VW bosses (..i.e: .. in few weeks wages cut by half .. and than fired, because VW'll close factory and move out to .. china or mexico..:) .. welcome to globalisation .. ... 'executive kinda guys' don't care about you (you are just 'human resources':) .. they care about 'company strategy/position', cost cutting, .. and their bonuses .. :)

  • Joe_thousandaire Joe_thousandaire on Feb 27, 2014

    The Big3 are in no way worried about the UAW going under, its just a nice thing to leak to the press, "oh jeez I hope you guys don't go under, cause we're such good friends and all". The fact that this was reported by the openly liberal and pro-union Freep says allot about its b.s. level too. As far as what xflowgolf is saying about rebranding the union, he's missing the whole point of the UAW to begin with. The entire existence of the UAW since its inception has been to take the lowest skilled, least educated, and laziest members of the American work force and give them simple repetition-based jobs at which they cannot fail or be fired from. Then through force of numbers make management pay them all upper middle-class wages. Absolutely no one who works for the UAW sees their membership as something to be earned, it is a birthright handed down by the gods to every GED or equivalent man and woman here in Michigan.

    • See 10 previous
    • U mad scientist U mad scientist on Feb 27, 2014

      @racer-esq. > If you really want to unwind history they only got the transplant factories, instead of them going to Mexico or staying at home, because of right-to-work laws and an anti-union culture. Fair point, but imo doesn't alter the conclusion above. The smart move would've been to set a trap for that bait.

  • Ajla On the Mach-E, I still don't like it but my understanding is that it helps allow Ford to continue offering a V8 in the Mustang and F-150. Considering Dodge and Ram jumped off a cliff into 6-cylinder land there's probably some credibility to that story.
  • Ajla If I was Ford I would just troll Stellantis at all times.
  • Ronin It's one thing to stay tried and true to loyal past customers; you'll ensure a stream of revenue from your installed base- maybe every several years or so.It's another to attract net-new customers, who are dazzled by so many other attractive offerings that have more cargo capacity than that high-floored 4-Runner bed, and are not so scrunched in scrunchy front seats.Like with the FJ Cruiser: don't bother to update it, thereby saving money while explaining customers like it that way, all the way into oblivion. Not recognizing some customers like to actually have right rear visibility in their SUVs.
  • MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
  • 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
Next