Diaz Promises Profitable Share Gains, More Competitive Titan For Nissan

by Cameron Aubernon

Published: February 28th, 2014

diaz promises profitable share gains more competitive titan for nissan

Nissan North America sales boss Fred Diaz expects his employer will gain more mind and market share in 2014 in the run-up to the 2016 Titan’s debut in showrooms, a truck promised to be more competitive than the current model.

Automotive News and WardsAuto report Nissan’s market share in 2013 nudged upward to 8 percent from 2012’s 7.9 percent share. Meanwhile, January 2014 sales rose 12 percent while overall industry sales fell 3 percent, and slashed sticker prices on a number of Nissan’s most popular models helped to to lower incentives by $375 while raising average transaction prices to $95 per unit sold.

Finally, Diaz himself met with the dealer advisory board monthly, as well as held discussions with all 1,167 dealerships in the United States, to learn about and adopt necessary product changes needed to bring more profits back to his employer.

One of the products in question is the 2016 Titan, where Diaz took those suggestions to heart during his visit to Nissan’s design studio in La Jolla, Calif.:

I was pleasantly surprised, but I also saw some things that could be improved significantly. No doubt I hurt some feelings and stepped on a few toes. I was pretty tough with the suggestions I made. We just needed to do a few things with the lines and the front of the vehicle.

The upcoming Titan is expected to match 90 percent of the competition’s various features and configurations in terms of cabs and engines, including a Cummins 5-liter turbodiesel V8. Nissan is also betting on the all-American soul that the newly designed pickup will bring to the table, having been engineered in Farmington Hills, Mich, designed in California, and assembled in Canton, Miss. with the aforementioned Cummins coming down from Columbus, Ind.

Diaz expects his employer will source 85 percent of vehicles sold in the U.S. to come from plants in the U.S. and Mexico. Nissan is also in the early stages of revamping its ordering system so dealers can order and receive inventory at a faster clip than current.

#Cummins #Diesels #FredDiaz #Light-dutyTrucks #MY2016 #Nissan #Titan

Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 7 comments

VCplayer on Feb 28, 2014

I'm not really sure Americanizing the trucks as much as possible is actually going to help sales. It sure hasn't helped the Tundra much. I wonder if the Japanese companies would be better served creating their own spin on the half ton pickup rather than trying to copy an America one.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Lowmanjoe on Feb 28, 2014
  
  Nissan pretty much did create their own spin on the 1/2 ton when the Titan originally came out in late '03. The high-utility bed featuring the channels for practically inifinite tie-down arrangements and accessory mounts as well as a 12V outlet, the fender storage box, wide-open rear doors on the king cab, locking rear diff and even 5-speed autos were no where to be found on other 1/2 tons at the time, now they all have them available as either standard or options, and have even moved beyond (adjustible ride height on the Ram comes to mind, more gears in the trans, etc...) Hopefully they will surprise us again with clever innovations like that and have it not just turn out to be an updated also-ran with a fancy diesel.
  
  Like
- Econobiker on Mar 06, 2014
  
  They need to capture the commercial market more. The Titan never had a single cab stripped down model to appeal to the contractor market, etc.
  
  Like
PrincipalDan on Mar 01, 2014

Employee has one of the Titan 4x2 crew cabs from the first few years of production and it has been rock solid for her. She's one of those people who thinks maintenance is oil changes and tires. Seems a decent quality to me just hasn't been a standout for any reason.

Like Reply
- Highdesertcat on Mar 01, 2014
  
  Yeah, rock solid has been my impression as well since I know a few retired GI's who bought the Titan. The 5.6 Endurance engine may not be as fancy as the Tundra 5.7, but it keeps running without any problems. Gas mileage is no better and no worse than anything similarly equipped and put to the same use, i.e. towing, hauling, commuting or driving around town. Biggest selling factor is price since a Titan of any version sells for a lot less than a Tundra, F150, Silverado or RAM similarly equipped.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.