Will The Next Generation Jeep Wrangler Lose Its Solid Axles?

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

With stricter fuel economy standards pushing automakers to reduce vehicle weight, it’s been suggested that the next generation Jeep Wrangler, due in 2016, might come with independent suspension. Solid axles weigh more than independent suspension and the Wrangler has solid axles in both the rear and front of the vehicle. Jeep brand manager Mike Manley hasn’t denied that the next Wrangler may lose the rugged axles that off-roaders love.

Not only would traditional CJ/Wrangler owners look askance at independent suspension, aftermarket suppliers would not be happy. The Wrangler’s simple live axle suspended by coil springs makes it the most popular SUV that people customize, according to SEMA, the Specialty Equipment Market Association. SUVs with more complex independent suspensions are less likely to be altered.

Chrysler has to be careful to avoid upsetting the current Wrangler’s customer base. For the first nine months of this year, Wrangler sales are up 11% to just under 120,000 units. Strong Wrangler sales helped Jeep set a brand sales record last year. Manley knows how important the Wrangler is to the Jeep franchise. “Massive. Absolutely massive,” Manley said to Automotive News. “Frankly, I know that if I screw up the next Wrangler, then I probably wouldn’t be able to leave my house for a long time.”

He wouldn’t promise, though, that the Wrangler will retain its sturdy solid axles. “We’re already in an environment where it’s a challenge to produce a vehicle in that way, and it’s going to get harder,” he said. “What I can tell you is that the vehicle is absolutely fundamental to our DNA, and it’s going to become progressively harder to make sure that the vehicle meets all of the standards that are required for it.”

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 96 comments
  • Thelaine Thelaine on Oct 30, 2013

    Just kill CAFE. It makes no sense.

  • Felis Concolor Felis Concolor on Oct 31, 2013

    Having enjoyed a a pair of far more off road capable vehicles possessing 4 wheel independently sprung suspensions for more than a decade I can only point and laugh at the Jeep fanboys who worry about losing their precious straight axle dinosaurs. Jeep's been riding the cutting edge WWII technology bandwagon longer than Mercedes and it's time to move up to tech that's only 55 years old. "IFS vs solid axles; which is better?" As a Pinzgauer and Haflinger owner, I know the answer is "neither."

    • See 5 previous
    • Mnm4ever Mnm4ever on Nov 02, 2013

      @mnm4ever Wow ok, so prob once the aftermarket suppliers found out that there were 402 less Wranglers on the road, they just threw in the towel and stopped carrying parts for it. Yeah, that makes sense.

  • Buickman if they name it "Recall" there will already be Brand Awareness!
  • 1995 SC I wish they'd give us a non turbo version of this motor in a more basic package. Inline Sixes in trucks = Good. Turbos that give me gobs of power that I don't need, extra complexity and swill fuel = Bad.What I need is an LV1 (4.3 LT based V6) in a Colorado.
  • 1995 SC I wish them the best. Based on the cluster that is Ford Motor Company at the moment and past efforts by others at this I am not optimistic. I wish they would focus on straigtening out the Myriad of issues with their core products first.
  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
Next