GM Found Responsible For Using "Ringer" Engines in Indian Emissions Testing, Tavera Production Resumes

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff
gm found responsible for using ringer engines in indian emissions testing tavera

The Times of India and the Hindustan Times are reporting that a panel appointed by the Indian government to look into General Motors’ recall last summer of 114,000 Chevrolet Tavera multiple use vehicles says that the company violated testing regulations, according to a government official who has seen the report. The recall came after a surprise check by the Automotive Research Association of India, an industry group that works with India’s Ministry of Transportation, found that the Tavera’s production diesel engines were not consistent with those that GM had supplied for testing.

The official told the news agency that the fault was GM’s not the lab doing the testing. Speaking on background, the official said, “The report has pointed out that it is in the nature of corporate fraud. It says only the [automaker] was responsible for whatever happened,” and that the automaker’s Indian subsidiary could be fined as much as 100 million rupees ($1.6 million) under current regulations. GM India released a statement saying that company policies had been violated and that it had identified those resposible.

Back in July, GM recalled the Indian made Tavera SUVs over the emission issue and also stopped production. At the time, The Economic Times of India reported that GM had told government investigators that employees had fitted vehicles sent for testing with ‘ringer’ engines, engines known to meet the standards.

Sam Winegarden, GM’s vice president for global engine engineering, and several other employees were fired when the scandal broke for unspecified “violations of company policy”.

“We determined there was an emissions problem,” GM India said in a statement on Tuesday. “We investigated it and identified violations of company policy. We held people accountable. And, we advised Indian authorities. Beyond that, we’re not able to comment as we’ve not heard from the government or seen the report.”

The company also reported to Reuters that it has received regulatory approvals and restarted production of the Tavera BS III models at its plant in Halol in the state of Gujarat state. GM India Vice President P. Balendran said, “GM India has already received BS III 7,8,9 and 10 seater type approvals and production has also started. BS IV approval is under process and approval is expected anytime now and will start production soon.”

Join the conversation
3 of 15 comments
  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Oct 24, 2013

    "...the company violated testing regulations, according to a government official who has seen the report." Oh well that's a credible primary source, isn't it? I read an engineering report on a vacuum cleaner the other day. I can build a Dyson in my basement now.

  • Golden2husky Golden2husky on Oct 24, 2013

    Before anybody roast GM too badly for this, let's look back about 15 years ago. There, you will find Honda did the same thing with their Accord when OBDII started. Seems Honda could not prevent the MIL from illuminating and they worried that this would hurt their reputation, so they reprogrammed the computer to ignore certain conditions to keep the light off. They got caught and had to fix the problem and extend some warranty points. My "Honda Only" SIL had such a car. Honda recalled it but was cagey with the facts. I informed her of what really happened. I am willing to bet others have done so; part of the problem with self certification. I guess the answer is to make the penalty so punitive that the manufacturer will think twice.

    • Doctor olds Doctor olds on Oct 25, 2013

      Honda was actually caught by the Japanese Government presenting a ringer, specially built car (Accord?)for crash testing. It had a double thickness floor plan to improve its score.

  • Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
  • ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
  • ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
  • Ed That has to be a joke.
  • SCE to AUX One data point: my rental '23 Model 3 had good build quality, but still not as good as my Hyundais.Test mule aside, perhaps the build quality of the CT will be good in 2027.