Distracted Driver Rams Motorcycle On Freeway, Faces No Charges

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth
distracted driver rams motorcycle on freeway faces no charges

It’s a video that simultaneously sends chills down the spine of every motorcyclist and confirms the worst fears of those who advocate for distracted-driving laws. A young man is flying down the right lane of a freeway at night in a V8-powered sedan. There is a couple riding a motorcycle at a normal speed in the middle of the lane. Without so much as touching the brakes, the young man hits the motorcycle, putting both of the riders in the hospital. After asking “Are you okay?” the driver starts checking his car for damage.

There’s no obvious malice in the video and the driver is stone-cold sober. It seems like an obvious case of texting and driving. When asked what caused the accident, the driver insists on referring questions to his attorney. But why he has an attorney isn’t immediately obvious, because he’s not being charged with anything.

What’s going on?


The image at the top of the article contains the clue: the driver was an on-duty patrolman. In the video obtained by CNN, you can see Ohio State Trooper Jacob Daymon ramming a motorcyle for no apparent reason. There are two obvious questions that arise after viewing the footage:

What was Trooper Daymon doing when he struck the motorcyclists? Was he texting? Chatting? Surfing the Internet? Most of us have seen troopers doing all of the above; your humble author was texting at a stoplight the other day when I realized the car pulling up behind me was an Ohio patrolman. I quickly hid my phone, but there was no reason to worry; the trooper was busy texting someone on his phone. Perhaps he wasn’t doing anything personal at all. It’s possible he was simply operating one of the myriad of in-car information systems that are part of the modern police car. If that’s what happened, then we need to ask: What makes us think that police officers have any more ability to safely operate a vehicle when looking away from the road than anyone else would? Did the in-car computers in Trooper Daymon’s car compel his attention to the point where he simply didn’t see the motorcycle approach for several seconds?

Why wasn’t Trooper Daymon charged? It’s a virtual certainty that a citizen in the same situation would face some sort of charge. At the very least, it’s reckless operation; at the worst, it’s an attempt at vehicular manslaughter. Particularly in rural Ohio, one might expect to have to face an arraignment and make bail in this situation. We keep hearing that distracted driving is equal to, or worse, than drunk driving. Imagine a drunk driver hitting a motorcycle under these conditions. He wouldn’t be sent home. Even a drunk cop might face discipline. What if there had been a fatality? What would have happened then?

Right now, there are more questions than answers. And as long as Greene County, Ohio implicitly supports Trooper Daymon’s actions, there probably always will be.

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 126 comments
  • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Sep 14, 2013

    Has Det. Hester officially stopped commenting and/or participating? Jack, get him back here if you can--his comments on this subject might be welcome.

  • Legally Brunette Legally Brunette on Sep 16, 2013

    I queried my favorite law enforcement officer (my brother) about this situation. He said that in his jurisdiction (not Ohio), such an officer would be charged, whether on or off duty, but that it would take some time for the charging to occur (until the investigation was complete, to include a subpoena, these days, of phone records to check for texting, etc). He said the same process would happen for anyone - no charges would be brought/no arrest would occur until the investigation concluded. He also indicated that the trooper should expect a civil lawsuit. I would expect a civil lawsuit with a HUGE payout, since the average person in a jury (if you can get one in Ohio in a civil suit like this) is likely to be unsympathetic to law enforcement, especially with video proof that the guy was paying no attention to the road.

  • Inside Looking Out All that is BS. Nissan just tries to buy time. By 2028 every Tesla will have fusion reactor under the hood. Commercial fusion reactor is under development as we speak 5 miles away from my home in Sandia labs in Livermore.
  • Lou_BC For some odd reason my new truck is more of a pain when it comes to incoming texts. I need data activated on phone and have it plugged into truck with Android Auto on. It doesn't work well with poor internet wireless access.The old Ford Sync system of 2010 vintage would play the text via a robotic voice and not allow a reply unless stopped. It was much more seamless and easier to work.
  • 28-Cars-Later Isn't that the Cayenne?
  • Kendahl I will look at my phone long enough to determine whether the caller is someone I really should talk to. If it is, I keep driving until I find a safe place to pull over before answering. If it isn't, to hell with them.I am greatly annoyed by people who sit at green traffic lights or drive well below the speed limit because they are focused on their phones instead of their driving. However, I don't express my frustration because (1) they don't think they're being inconsiderate and (2) may retaliate with road rage.
  • VoGhost What to name a car for people insecure about the size of their 'manhood'? Magnum. What do name a car for people insecure about their orientation? STR8. Nobody -- and I mean nobody -- knows their customer base like FCA/Stellantis.
Next