Scuderia Driver and SCCA Auto-X Champion Faces Questions Related to Hit And Run

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

How often have you heard someone go on and on about how real road racers and autocrossers don’t screw around and endanger other people on the street? The answer to that probably depends on how much time you spend hanging around road racers and autocrossers. Radomin Delgado might be an exception: he was cited doing 105mph in a 70 some time ago, and is a “person of interest” in a crash that totaled his 2009 Ferrari F430 Scuderia, killed one man, and severely injured the man’s life-long partner. Yet he was an SCCA champion and NASA instructor.

Mr. Delgado’s actions aren’t sitting very well with police or the public, but you could learn a little from what he’s done, so let’s discuss.

If you read two articles about the crash here and here you’ll get all the details, but the precis runs like so: Early Saturday morning Delgado’s “Scud” clipped the back of a Hyundai on I-75 near Hialeah. The Hyundai tumbled end-over-end. The driver, retired postal worker Jorge Arrojas, was killed. Mr. Arrojas’ partner, Miguel Larrieu, was injured.

When the police arrived, the driver of the Ferrari had fled the scene. The Florida Highway Patrol went looking for the guy. They didn’t find him. On Monday, an attorney contacted the police and indicated that he was representing Mr. Delgado. The negotiations will now proceed.

If you’re like most people, your response to this is “OMFG THIS GUY IS SOOOOOO GUILTY HE SHOULD JUST TURN HIMSELF IN.” That’s certainly Mr. Miguel Larrieu’s opinion about the whole thing. However, it’s worth noting that Mr. Delgado has a right to representation and to negotiate the terms of his surrender to police, if that even happens. I have no idea how the crash actually went down — I believe the usual procedure in events like this is to claim that some guy named Dietrich was driving. But regardless of what the true story is, Delgado is smart. If he’s not guilty, he loses nothing by lawyering up and he increases his chances of coming out of this clean. If he is guilty, he’s significantly limited the amount of ammunition the cops have against him. By fleeing the scene of the accident, he opened himself up to probably just a single additional charge — namely, fleeing the scene of an accident — but in exchange he’s managed to ensure that every interaction he has with the police will take place with the presence of counsel. That’s smart, even if what he did prior to that was stupid, because this is going to be at the very least a vehicular manslaughter case and you can go to jail for a Very. Long. Time. over that.

So what can we learn from this:

0. Don’t run into people at high speeds.


1. Even great racing drivers aren’t immune to stupidity and/or failure of talent on public roads.


2. Don’t talk to the police without an attorney present.


3. Like the man on “Hill Street Blues” said, be careful out there.

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 48 comments
  • Krhodes1 Krhodes1 on Aug 14, 2013

    From the point of view of minimizing possible charges, the guy probably did the right thing. If the police had probably cause, there would already be a warrant for his arrest. It was 12:30 in the morning, so likely no one got a good look at him. At this point, likely all they can *prove* is that this guy owns the car left at the scene of the accident. I have no doubt that they are trying VERY hard to put him behind the wheel, but in the real world that may well not happen. As Jack pointed out, he lets everyone and anyone drive the car. And for all we know, maybe it was his kid that was driving the car. A d-bag for not taking immediate responsibility for his actions (if he was driving), but a smart d-bag. And guys who can afford late model Ferraris tend to have VERY good lawyers.

  • AMC_CJ AMC_CJ on Aug 15, 2013

    This is a good discussion piece, and I like the point of view it takes. Nobody is talking about the moral or right thing to do; I think we all know that by default, so why beat it into the ground? Another editorial hanging some evil doer; isn't there enough of those out there? Never mind if it takes no thinking at all to write. I see where the author is coming from, it makes you think, it starts a good discussion (if you can get past the idiots and the typical knee-jerk reaction). Yeah this guy is probably a bad man and guilty. Really, is that the article you want to waste your time reading? Not me. Don't listen to the idiots, unless readership numbers are important...... because they're a lot of idiots out there.

  • Kwik_Shift Hyunkia'sis doing what they do best...subverting expectations of quality.
  • MaintenanceCosts People who don't use the parking brake when they walk away from the car deserve to have the car roll into a river.
  • 3-On-The-Tree I’m sure they are good vehicles but you can’t base that on who is buying them. Land Rovers, Bentley’ are bought by Robin Leaches’s “The Rich and Famous” but they have terrible reliability.
  • SCE to AUX The fix sounds like a bandaid. Kia's not going to address the defective shaft assemblies because it's hard and expensive - not cool.
  • Analoggrotto I am sick and tired of every little Hyundai Kia Genesis flaw being blown out of proportion. Why doesn't TTAC talk about the Tundra iForce Max problems, Toyota V35A engine problems or the Lexus 500H Hybrid problems? Here's why: education. Most of America is illiterate, as are the people who bash Hyundai Kia Genesis. Surveys conducted by credible sources have observed a high concentration of Hyundai Kia Genesis models at elite ivy league universities, you know those places where students earn degrees which earn more than $100K per year? Get with the program TTAC.
Next