Editorial: The Future Is Here At Nissan – Just Not In The Way You're Expecting

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

The big news this past week from Nissan: lots of old iron at Pebble Beach, concept car test drives for sympathetic journalists and a pledge to have autonomous cars ready (but not on sale) for 2020. More interesting than that is news of Nissan’s booming exports from America. Some say that this is the “new normal” – Japanese OEMs expanding their manufacturing base in America as they leave Japan en masse to both insulate themselves from a volatile yen, take advantage of America’s welcoming manufacturing climate and shed a reliance on Japan’s aging and declining population. And even more interesting than that is how it was presented.

The clip above, which is packaged like a broadcast news report, actually comes from Nissan’s internal communications team in Tokyo. Rather than just issuing a press release, Nissan is looking to have an even greater role in influencing the conversation (awful word I know, but it’s apt). They aren’t just disseminating information to journalists: they are cutting them out entirely. Whatever discussions we may have at TTAC over the efficacy of automotive media or the competency of its press corps, this is a significant development. I don’t think it’s inconceivable that one day, brands will have a stranglehold on the automotive discourse.

Press cars and press trip invites are one way that brands currently manage who has access to product and people, and these are used as both carrots and sticks. In a way, it’s hard to fault PR people for this practice. PR staff, by definition, are committed to disseminating their client’s story, even if it runs counter to the findings of a journalist. Not caring about these perks is one way to subvert the established order, as former EIC Ed Niedermeyer successfully did during his tenure. Even when doing so, it’s possible to get information from internal sources and third-party outlets. But Nissan appears to be going a step further.


Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • DR1665 DR1665 on Aug 28, 2013

    "I don’t think it’s inconceivable that one day, brands will have a stranglehold on the automotive discourse." Perhaps, from an automotive media perspective, in which case I'll be quietly cheering for the en masse starvation of shills more interested in serving advertisers than subscribers. That said, so long as there are owner/enthusiasts out there who love their machines, no corporation will ever truly own the message. OEMs would be well advised to reallocate some of their huckster sycophant budget to sourcing content from people who actually bought and live with the vehicles on a daily basis. If you want something done right...

  • Lie2me Lie2me on Aug 28, 2013

    I think this great for honest automotive reporting. Once auto makers think they have a "stranglehold" on the output of information they'll cut out the perks to journalist and they can report on cars without the memory of some wonderful golf outing supplied by the company who's car he's reporting on distracting him from clear objectivity.

  • ArialATOMV8 All I hope is that the 4Runner stays rugged and reliable.
  • Arthur Dailey Good. Whatever upsets the Chinese government is fine with me. And yes they are probably monitoring this thread/site.
  • Jalop1991 WTO--the BBB of the international trade world.
  • Dukeisduke If this is really a supplier issue (Dana-Spicer? American Axle?), Kia should step up and say they're going to repair the vehicles (the electronic parking brake change is a temporary fix) and lean on or sue the supplier to force them to reimburse Kia Motors for the cost of the recall.Neglecting the shaft repairs are just going to make for some expensive repairs for the owners down the road.
  • MaintenanceCosts But we were all told that Joe Biden does whatever China commands him to!
Next