VW Repeats Patterns Of Bad Behavior, Revives Phaeton For North America

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Having failed to learn from previous mistakes, Volkswagen is inexplicably bringing the Phaeton back to North America, despite being totally contradictory to their push downmarket to appeal to mainstream American car shoppers.

The Phaeton could return as soon as January, with an unveiling at the 2014 North American International Auto Show. According to Martin Winterkorn, the Phaeton is essential to Volkswagen’s plans for America.

“A brand as large as Volkswagen needs a halo project in the upscale segment…We’ve seen what happens to brands that don’t have that kind of project.”

A few things seem more pressing right now than re-introducing an expensive luxury sedan wearing a VW badge. For one, introducing a mid-size crossover (or two) should be a priority for VW, given its importance in the American marketplace. Figuring out where it will be made ( along with the associated labor issues) is also a more pressing matter than the new Phaeton.

It’s also hard to reconcile how a premium sedan will fit with Volkswagen’s Americanized lineup of sub-$15k Jettas and Camry-fighting Passats. These products are being sold on the promise of value-for-money and other attributes Americans typically value. But other products, like the Passat CC, Touraeg and even to an extent, the Golf, are holdouts of the more “European” Volkswagen, featuring nicer interior materials, bolder styling and in some cases, higher price points. Despite attempting to re-jig their lineup towards the value end of the spectrum, VW still doesn’t seem to know what direction it wants to go in and sales are starting to reflect that. Inventories are high, incentives are abundant and its gotten to the point where layoffs are occurring at Chattanooga because of the slow paces of sales. Introducing the Phaeton will pull it increasingly in one direction. Whether it’s the right one is up for debate.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 140 comments
  • Kristjan Ambroz Kristjan Ambroz on Jul 22, 2013

    Another point to be mentioned is that Federalizing the Phaeton may be a fairly low investment this time around. The current Phaeton is just a facelifted version of the already Federalized one, so the costs may well be significantly lower than one would incur if bringing a completely new and as of yet unfederalized product to the US, such as the Scirocco or Polo.

  • MinPVD MinPVD on Jul 22, 2013

    why wouldn't they make this an audi?

  • Ronin It's one thing to stay tried and true to loyal past customers; you'll ensure a stream of revenue from your installed base- maybe every several years or so.It's another to attract net-new customers, who are dazzled by so many other attractive offerings that have more cargo capacity than that high-floored 4-Runner bed, and are not so scrunched in scrunchy front seats.Like with the FJ Cruiser: don't bother to update it, thereby saving money while explaining customers like it that way, all the way into oblivion. Not recognizing some customers like to actually have right rear visibility in their SUVs.
  • MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
  • 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Same as the Land Cruiser, emissions. I have a 1985 FJ60 Land Cruiser and it’s a beast off-roading.
  • CanadaCraig I would like for this anniversary special to be a bare-bones Plain-Jane model offered in Dynasty Green and Vintage Burgundy.
Next