Junkyard Find: 1976 Toyota Corolla Deluxe Liftback

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Having driven quite a few mid-70s Corollas (these cars were as commonplace during my early driving years as are second-gen Tauruses today), I have to say that they were painfully slow even by the tolerant standards of the Middle Malaise Era. However, they were also shockingly reliable by the era’s standards, which means that these cars were still plentiful on the street until well into the 1990s. Since few outside a hard core of fanatics have shown much interest in pre-AE86 Corollas, these cars get scrapped as soon as something expensive breaks and/or the Rust Monster’s bites get too large. Here’s a Deluxe liftback that I found in a Colorado self-serve yard a few weeks back.



“A welded body, not a nuts-and-bolts body!”

This was the era of 5-digit odometers (I believe Toyota went to 6-digit units in the early 1980s), so there’s no telling if this is a 90,278-mile car or a 590,278-mile car.

The interior is in pretty good shape, so I’m guessing this car has no more than 190,278 miles on the clock.

While the 1976 Toyota subcompact version of “Deluxe” seems laughably Spartan today, this car did have some features you didn’t see on many cars in its cheapo price range.

Rear window defroster!

AM radio with slider-style tone and volume controls!

Most cars in Colorado don’t rust much, thanks to the area’s single-digit humidity, but Japanese cars of the 1970s were surpassed only by air-cooled Volkswagens in the “rust anywhere, rust everywhere” department.

It’s possible that this car spent much of its life in the Midwest, but this Colorado dealer emblem says otherwise.

The liftback hatch made these cars excellent haulers.

That is, they were excellent haulers if you didn’t have to move anything heavy… or carry passengers… or drive uphill. The pushrod 2TC was good for 75 horsepower, but it felt like less.

If you had one of these in your 2TC car, you needed plenty of patience when negotiating freeway onramps or attempting to pass a slow camper in the mountains. Still, these engines were hard to kill.








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Cls12vg30 Cls12vg30 on Jul 16, 2013

    Ah, memories. My father bought a lightly-used '78 Corolla SR5 Lift-Back in 1979, I think. It was to replace the '73 Pinto my parents had when I was born. I grew up in that Toyota, Dad drove it from the time I was 3 until I was 14. It was a dark burgundy color with those same gunmetal wheels as in the commercial. His was a 5-speed with A/C. (It was purchased in Charleston, South Carolina.) We moved to Buffalo, NY in 1986, and by the early '90s the Corolla was rusting pretty bad. One day Dad was tinkering underneath and a piece of frame rail came off in his hand. He promptly sold the car for $300. We would see it around town for at least a year after that. He's still nostalgic about that car. If I could find one in restorable condition, I'd buy it for him in a minute.

  • Jim brewer Jim brewer on Jul 18, 2013

    Had a 75 Corolla wagon as my first car out of college. Sold for 5K new and I paid $2,500 for it with 100K on the engine and 120K on the car. In those days a 5yr old Japanese car with 100K on it would sell for 1/2 its original retail value. It was reasonably spritely with the stick. Nicely appointed if simple interior, dignified lines. An all-around honest car.

  • Rna65689660 For such a flat surface, why not get smoke tint, Rtint or Rvynil. Starts at $8. I used to use a company called Lamin-x, but I think they are gone. Has held up great.
  • Cprescott A cheaper golf cart will not make me more inclined to screw up my life. I can go 500 plus miles on a tank of gas with my 2016 ICE car that is paid off. I get two weeks out of a tank that takes from start to finish less than 10 minutes to refill. At no point with golf cart technology as we know it can they match what my ICE vehicle can do. Hell no. Absolutely never.
  • Cprescott People do silly things to their cars.
  • Jeff This is a step in the right direction with the Murano gaining a 9 speed automatic. Nissan could go a little further and offer a compact pickup and offer hybrids. VoGhost--Nissan has  laid out a new plan to electrify 16 of the 30 vehicles it produces by 2026, with the rest using internal combustion instead. For those of us in North America, the company says it plans to release seven new vehicles in the US and Canada, although it’s not clear how many of those will be some type of EV.Nissan says the US is getting “e-POWER and plug-in hybrid models” — each of those uses a mix of electricity and fuel for power. At the moment, the only all-electric EVs Nissan is producing are the  Ariya SUV and the  perhaps endangered (or  maybe not) Leaf.In 2021, Nissan said it would  make 23 electrified vehicles by 2030, and that 15 of those would be fully electric, rather than some form of hybrid vehicle. It’s hard to say if any of this is a step forward from that plan, because yes, 16 is bigger than 15, but Nissan doesn’t explicitly say how many of those 16 are all-battery, or indeed if any of them are.  https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/25/24111963/nissan-ev-plan-2026-solid-state-batteries
  • Jkross22 Sure, but it depends on the price. All EVs cost too much and I'm talking about all costs. Depreciation, lack of public/available/reliable charging, concerns about repairability (H/K). Look at the battering the Mercedes and Ford EV's are taking on depreciation. As another site mentioned in the last few days, cars aren't supposed to depreciate by 40-50% in a year or 2.
Next