Holden To Aussie Government "Moar Monies Plz"

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Hot on the heels of a $275 million “investment”, Holden is going back to the Australian government, hat in hand, asking for more money. This time, Holden wants another $265 million to keep their assembly plants online.

According to Holden, assembling cars like the Cruze and Commodore in Australia carries a premium in the neighborhood of $3460 USD compared with other locales like Korea. The Thailand built Colorado 7 and the Korean-built Captiva, both crossovers, are said to help offset the loss-making nature of Australian manufacturing.

Holden is said to be seeking more money in the wake of Ford’s closing of their Australian manufacturing operations. The incoming administration in Australia’s government are known to be supportive of propping up Australia’s manufacturing sector, with the new Industry Minister a vocal supporter of the auto industry. Meanwhile, opposition figures have indicated that they would look to dramatically cut subsidies for the auto sector, so Holden may be feeling extra pressure to get a deal signed sooner rather than later.

While Holden has previously been firm in its commitment to Australian manufacturing, the tone seems to have changed, with Holden indicating that further investment is a prerequisite for maintaining a manufacturing presence in the country. Holden isn’t alone either; Toyota is said to be looking for government subsidies as well, as a rapidly changing auto market and unfavorable exchange rates has left many auto makers caught flat-footed down under.

While other countries are making substantial investments in their auto sector, Australia, like Canada, has been taking cautious half measured, investing more modest amounts in conjunction with the OEMs and while adopting a “wait and see” approach. Both countries are watching their auto plants gradually fade in both importance and number, as cheaper manufacturing sites and unfavorable exchange rates and other structural factors erode whatever competitive advantages the two countries may have once had.

The nature of globalized product lines also doesn’t do any favors for Australia, which used to assemble vehicles that were locally popular, like large rear drive sedans and Ute pickups. But with the Ford Falcon gone, the Holden Commodore rumored to be moving to a global platform and consumers flocking to vehicles like the Toyota Hilux, Ford Ranger and Holden Colorado for their truck fix, Australian cars and their manufacturing sites seem to be slowly losing the battle for their lives.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 23 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jul 18, 2013

    Here is why an auto manufacturing industry isn't viable in Australia. Read this article and see how much you earn working at McDonalds in Australia. Essentially its to expensive to subsidies our auto manufacturers. http://www.news.com.au/business/worklife/mcdonald8217s-slammed-for-budget-fail/story-e6frfm9r-1226681193539

  • Doctor olds Doctor olds on Jul 20, 2013

    If your manufacturing sector dies, what will you do for national income when the natural resources run out?

    • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jul 23, 2013

      @doc olds I think you live in the past when manufacturing of a nation measured its success. We don't live in the 50s and 60s anymore. We have agriculture and the associated industries as well as mining and the associated industries, as well as tourism, our level of manufacturing is almost on par with the US as it represents 12% of our GDP. Australia is currently investing into what is called the NBN, the national broadband network. This will leave many nations behind in communications. This is the future as well. Developing infrastructure to allow us to be more competitive is investing wisely. Investing into union supported nowhere jobs and industry is an unwise investment. If more manufacturing was viable we would have it, just to reduce our standard of living to make us competitive unnecessarily is bad business. Our resources have over 200 years before depletion. Check out Australia reserves of mineral wealth, you'll be shocked. I'm talking economically viably extracted minerals. I recommend we wait until then to find out what to manufacture.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next