Escalades to Lose Basketball Sized Laurels, Cadillac to Prune Wreaths

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Cadillac is making a major change to its logo for the first time since 1999, rumored to be appearing for the first time next month at Pebble Beach. If Cadillac does use the Pebble Beach festivities to introduce the large RWD flagship sedan that Dan Akerson recently announced, you can expect to see it bearing the new logo for its public debut as well. The current logo is rather long in the tooth for a Cadillac emblem. It’s usually changed more frequently, 40 times since it was first used in 1906. The latest iteration will not have the laurel wreath that currently surrounds the coat of arms.

According to Cadillac PR, the original Cadillac crest was inspired by the family coat of arms of Antoine de la Mothe Cadillac. Apparently, though, the founder of Detroit and the namesake of the car company was really named Antoine Laumet and he not only borrowed the la Mothe Cadillac name from an actual French nobleman (in the New World, who would know?) he also borrowed elements of the crest of the la Mothe Cadillac family to create his own (that’s where the ducks, marlettes, or swans came from). The car company borrowed from Laumet/Cadillac’s crest when designing their first logo, which included the wreath.

The change is apparently in reaction to the desires of both consumers and Cadillac designers. Cadillac has been trying to have a more youthful image and focus groups reported perceiving the wreaths as “outdated and obsolete”. Considering the wreath first appeared in 1906, that makes sense. Actually, Cadillac’s logo didn’t have that element from 1920 until it was restored in 1968. Of course to most young people, anything from 1968 might indeed seem outdated and obsolete. Cadillac designers would also prefer a simpler, one-piece emblem because it gives them more flexibility in terms of placement. It also may look better with the cars’ lines. While the Art and Science theme that identifies current Cadillacs is changing, introducing more sculpted elements, from the look of the new CTS, hard edges will be part of Cadillacs’ look for the foreseeable future and round wreaths don’t work so well with designs that have sharp creases.

While Cadillac marketers and designers may cheer the change, dealers will have to pay for new signs and anything else that bears the logo.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 35 comments
  • Alexndr333 Alexndr333 on Jul 24, 2013

    Since they vertically stretched the Corvette logo for 2014, I'd like to see if a similar vertical treatment of the 1959 Cadillac logo wouldn't fit with the Art & Science design vocabulary.

  • Lichtronamo Lichtronamo on Jul 24, 2013

    I like the idea above of no logo on the front - it would stand out. Nowdays everyone has a logo on the front center, and one on the rear center typically flanked by the model name and trim.

  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
Next