Toyota Corolla Live Pictures

by Derek Kreindler

Published: June 7th, 2013

Live shots from the Corolla reveal. The white car is the “Eco” model, while the grey car is the LE. The red “S” was featured prominently throughout the reveal. Anybody more interested in Junkyard Finds can click the jump.

Let’s hit the re-wind switch to a time before beige …

B&B, is ths a KE10 or one of the “Peanut/Mangro” TE27 Coupes?

This is most definitely a shooting brake. Unfortunately, the crappy lighting doesn’t do justice to how nice this car is.

The malaise era ‘Rolla

And, oddly enough, an FX16 instead of an AE86. I guess Toyota didn’t want to pay California asking prices ($4000 for a clapped out, primered SR5-GTS conversion)

#2014ToyotaCorolla #Toyota #ToyotaCorolla

Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 65 comments

Nickoo on Jun 08, 2013

Surprisingly, I like this update, but I would never choose a corolla over a comparable scion tc as the tc has a far superior drive-train and has a hatch, the downside being you are stuck with a 2 door.

Like Reply
Corey Lewis on Jun 10, 2013

This is a vast improvement over the outgoing one, though I agree there's no excuse for a 4-speed in 2014. Wish they'd dump those "sporty" wheels though, as they wouldn't look good on any car. I remember as a young kid seeing lots of those hatchback FX16s. So many go-faster details on the sides!

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Buickman I like it!
JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
1995 SC No