Junkyard Find: 1980 Chrysler Cordoba

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

It seems strange, but sufficient Chrysler Cordobas still exist to provide a sporadic flow of fresh examples to self-serve wrecking yards. In this series, we’ve seen this ’78, another ’78, this ’79, and now today’s personally luxurious blue ’80.

The downsized second-gen 1980-83 Cordobas, which were based on the Volare/Diplomat platform and didn’t differ much from their Dodge Mirada siblings, sold very poorly. You aren’t going to find many of these things today, either on the street or lined up before the Crusher’s jaws.

Soft Corinthian Leather was still an option— Ricardo Montalban would have quit in disgust otherwise— but this car has the more affordable soft Corinthian Velour.

With a smog-o-lated 318 under the hood, chopping a few hundred extra pounds out of the Cordoba for the ’80 model year made this car a much livelier performer.

The landau roof and touch-o-plastic-class grille treatment were properly Cordoba-ish, but where did the “gold” medallions go?


Not to worry, Ricardo liked what they did to his car!









Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 34 comments
  • Big_gms Big_gms on Feb 03, 2014

    Looks like Chrysler designers "borrowed" some styling cues from other automakers. The front end somewhat resembles a 1978-80 Mercury Monarch, while the taillights look a bit like those on a 1977 Buick Electra 225. This car is a reminder of why GM absolutely dominated the personal luxury segment in the early Eighties. With this mediocre redesign of the Cordoba and the introduction of it's Dodge Mirada sibling, and with Ford's poorly received 1980 redesign of the Thunderbird and Cougar, both automakers pretty much handed the personal luxury segment over to GM on a silver platter.

    • Jcaesar Jcaesar on Apr 14, 2016

      If I remember correctly, the Cordoba was never really a personal luxury car...more of a mid-size, like a Monte Carlo, Regal or Grand Prix. Imperial was the only real personal luxury car Chrysler built ('81-'83) that competed w/the Caddy Eldorado, Olds Toronado, Buick Riveria, and Lincoln Mark in price and luxury. The T-bird was relegated to the mid-size class w/it's '77 make-over.

  • Jcaesar Jcaesar on Apr 14, 2016

    It's sad when you see a car like this. You can tell it was lovingly cared for during it's lifetime and when it's owner passed on or was no longer able to drive, it went to a family member or friend who drove it into the ground. This happened to my great uncle's '71 Riv. It sat pampered 44 years in a garage and meticulously maintained the entire time. When he and my great aunt passed, his daughter destroyed it within a year and it went to a junk yard.

  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
Next