House Committee Blasts Overpaid Bailed-Out Execs. The Freep Blasts GM

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Yesterday, the House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee held a hearing to look into executive compensation “at bailed-out firms that is egregiously out of line with what the President committed to the American people,” as Chairman Jim Jordan said. Jordan recalled that the President had committed “that top executives at firms that receive extraordinary help from U.S. tax payers will have their compensation capped at half a million dollars.” That clearly wasn’t the truth. Yesterday, we heard that GM CEO Dan Akerson, for example, made $9 million in 2012 and wanted $11.1 this year. Jordan said that “Treasury’s failure to protect tax payers is part of a disturbing pattern in which this administration makes promises to the public but the does not live up to them.” That’s not the only pattern that is disturbing.

Fight government waste, advance to 8:45

Yesterday, media outlets, including TTAC, received a message from GM spokesman Alan Adler, complaining about “leaked documents” and that “reports that General Motors has requested an increase in Dan Akerson’s 2013 compensation are false. In fact, Dan specifically asked to keep his compensation at the same level for 2013 as it was in 2012 and 2011.”

With this statement, GM continued the pattern of alienating its last friends. The Detroit Free Press, which initially had published the documents, writes today that “GM called the report false, though the committee later released the same document showing a proposed total compensation package of $11.1 million for Akerson.” The Freep then put its finger on an even more embarrassing fact:

It turns out that Akerson already made $11.1 million in 2012, “because he was allowed to cash in stock awards he received in 2011,” the Freep says. So, $11.1 million in 2012 and $11.1 million in 2013 wouldn’t be a raise. At least not this year, sure. Splitting hairs may work in court, but not in the court of opinion. Trying to be too smart often looks very stupid.

We have linked to the full recording of the hearings. They are another example of Government waste, in this case of bytes and bandwidth. The first 8 minutes and 45 seconds are a recording of nothing. Your tax dollars at work.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 34 comments
  • Stickmaster Stickmaster on Feb 28, 2013

    Some of the comments here prove that the hoi polloi in America will defend to the death their corporate masters, always believing that they must have "earned" their way to the top through old-fashioned hard work and honesty, and that surely these brilliant executives need even more compensation for sending the stock to infinity and rewarding us mere mortals with even more useless gizmos which will surely make us live forever. All hail the American CEO! All hail the American CEO!

  • Probert Probert on Mar 01, 2013

    So lets see: you choose this topic because GM got a bailout loan that they're repaying from profits of products sold. The loan saved 10 of thousands of jobs in the deepest part of a recession but that's unforgivable. Meanwhile reports come out the the main perpetrators of the recession- wall street banks (estimated economic destruction equivalent to 20% of gdp) - have been getting - in addition to their huge bailout - and constant stream of taxpayer funding to the tune of about 90,000,000,000 dollars a year. Which curiously is about the same as their purported profits. 11 mill is too much but harping on GM (and even complaining they don't play nice with ttac) is, in the greater scheme of things, a bit petty.

    • Mor2bz Mor2bz on Mar 01, 2013

      Let's not see anything. After the US sells its shares of GM about 35% will still be lost (I haven't bothered to look up the exact amount, which will vary with current stockprices as the shares are gradually sold). How will the jobs be "saved" if GM continues to make shitty cars? And aren't many of the jobs shit since a tiered pay structure is now in place for new employees? Of course it's all small change to what the baron robber bank fucks have walked off with; no argument there.

  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
  • ChristianWimmer The body kit modifications ruined it for me.
  • ToolGuy "I have my stance -- I won't prejudice the commentariat by sharing it."• Like Tim, I have my opinion and it is perfect and above reproach (as long as I keep it to myself). I would hate to share it with the world and risk having someone critique it. LOL.
Next