Honda Took The Wrong D-D-D-Direction With The CR-V In India

by Faisal Ali Khan

Published: February 25th, 2013

honda took the wrong d d d direction with the cr v in india

The Honda CR-V might be a major success in Europe and America, but in India, it performs very poorly, selling in double digit numbers every month. Since the time of launch, Honda has sold 13,739 units of the CR-V in India. Honda launched the CR-V here ten years ago in 2003, and it still isn’t in the groove. India is d-d-d-diesel dominated, and SUVs and crossovers better be diesel or they are d-d-d-destined for d-d-doom. BMW recently launched its facelifted X1 in India, offering it with a diesel engine only. Yes, heresy, d-d-dat’s right.

Fuel prices have headed northwards in the past few years, and the shift towards diesel cars started in 2007, when many companies brought in modern diesel engines to the country. While all car makers were busy churning out diesel powered cars, Honda was adamant, saying their diesel engines won’t work with Indian fuel quality. Their market share d-d-d-dropped d-d-d-d-drastically. Now finally they are accepting the shift in d-d-d-demand. Honda brings diesel powered small cars to India. But still no diesel CR-V.

Honda has instead chosen to offer 2.0-litre and 2.4-litre petrol engines on the CR-V in India. Honda already sells the CR-V in Europe with a 1.6-litre diesel engine. However they don’t plan to bring it to India, blaming diesel quality. What this has resulted in, is poor sales for a very capable car. Indians have never heard of the SsangYong brand earlier. Mahindra (the new owners of this Korean company) launched the Rexton W in India. And guess what? The Rexton sells ten times more than the CR-V, simply because its armed with a diesel engine. When will Honda learn?

Faisal Ali Khan is the editor of MotorBeam.com, a website covering the automobile industry of India.

#FaisalAliKhan #India

Faisal Ali Khan

More by Faisal Ali Khan

Comments

Join the conversation

7 of 24 comments

Kyree on Feb 25, 2013

I'll tell you that the lack of a diesel CR-V in India isn't out of stubbornness. Either the bean-counters have determined that it isn't worth the development costs--because diesel-quality truly *does* vary between regions--or they're just not interested. Either way, I'm sure they'd oblige if they wanted to.

Like Reply
- Faisal Ali Khan on Feb 26, 2013
  
  Kyree, all cars in that segment are powered by diesel and there are atleast 5 of them.
  
  Like
Beerboy12 on Feb 25, 2013

As far as I know Honda has resisted Diesels all together. I believe they only made their first one a few years ago. That philosophy was completely un-notised in the US and treated with indifference or mild supprise in the rest of the world. I did not realize that India was a "diesel" market but it makes sense that Honda would struggle there.

Like Reply
- See 3 previous
- PCP on Feb 26, 2013
  
  It definitely took Honda too long to develop Diesel engines, but then their 2.2l (2005 ?) was engine of the year and the new 1.6l seems even better. So I guess they should be out of (lame) excuses now.
  
  Like
- Spreadsheet monkey on Feb 26, 2013
  
  @PCP Yes the 2.2 diesel came out in 2005. Here in the UK, the engine quickly got a poor reputation for rapid oil consumption and premature clutch/DMF failure, nothing that can be blamed on fuel quality and in sharp contrast to the excellent reputation of its petrol engines. Maybe Honda just doesn't think this engine is durable enough for India?
  
  Like
- Faisal Ali Khan on Feb 27, 2013
  
  @spreadsheet monkey However Honda has stated it is going all out with diesel cars in Australia. The CR-V and Civic hatchback are getting diesels there soon.
  
  Like
- PCP on Mar 13, 2013
  
  @spreadsheet monkey That certainly doesn't account to me, then. 200'000km, first clutch, no major problems and still running strong. No measurable oil consumption (I change it myself, every 25'000+km only!). And the dealerships I talked to all reported the same. Only problems were a cloaked up EGR valve and a loose nut - on the high pressure diesel pump drive shaft, though. No damage, but quite some work to change the shaft.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
Lorenzo A friend bought one of these new. Six months later he traded it in for a Chrysler PT Cruiser. He already had a 1998 Corvette, so I thought he just wanted more passenger space. It turned out someone broke into the SSR and stole $1500 of tools, without even breaking the lock. He figured nobody breaks into a PT Cruiser, but he had a custom trunk lock installed.
Jeff Not bad just oil changes and tire rotations. Most of the recalls on my Maverick have been fixed with programming. Did have to buy 1 new tire for my Maverick got a nail in the sidewall.
Carson D Some of my friends used to drive Tacomas. They bought them new about fifteen years ago, and they kept them for at least a decade. While it is true that they replaced their Tacomas with full-sized pickups that cost a fair amount of money, I don't think they'd have been Tacoma buyers in 2008 if a well-equipped 4x4 Tacoma cost the equivalent of $65K today. Call it a theory.
Eliyahu A fine sedan made even nicer with the turbo. Honda could take a lesson in seat comfort.