BMW Pulls Ahead With Investors

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

The S-Class Mercedes has been the default choice for the global taste-and-wealth set for a very long time, probably since the demise of the Elwood Engel Continental. The 7-Series BMW, by contrast, has always been a slightly embarrassing purchase, the choice of the man cut out from the classy club by birth, ignorance, or a slightly unseemly insistence on driving dynamics. BMW is the striver’s brand, launched into the spotlight by a man who was sort of the Nadia Comaneci of sweaty social climbing. Mercedes is the real thing. Hasn’t it ever been thus?

German investors, on the other hand, seem to like the Roundel.

An article published by Bloomberg late last week seems to suggest that the bloom is off the Daimler-Benz rose, and a large part of that is due to the infamous Dr. Z:

BMW’s market capitalization has surged to 45 billion euros ($58.8 billion), versus 42.2 billion for Daimler. Subtract a reasonable price for Daimler’s truck business — the world’s biggest — and the value investors assign to Mercedes stands at about 25 billion euros.

“The market is saying that the prospects for Mercedes are much worse than for BMW,” said Hans-Peter Wodniok, an analyst with Fairesearch in Kronberg, Germany. “The market’s always right. In terms of innovation, BMW is the leader.”

“The market’s confidence in Daimler management is pretty much at rock bottom,” said Max Warburton, a Bernstein analyst in Singapore. “Investors have little or no confidence that current management will be able to do what is necessary to close the gap to BMW.”

One would think that the time to have lost confidence in Daimler management would have been a decade ago, when the product was iffy at best and even the mighty S-Class was often seen driving around with a dead COMAND screen and a droopy air suspension. Sometimes perception lags reality. Not to worry, though: investors may be bearish on the three-pointed star but there’s redemption ahead.

the potential of the Mercedes brand in China is “ overwhelming,” said Yale Zhang, managing director of consultancy Automotive Foresight in Shanghai. “Every consumer understands the value of Mercedes and the logo.

While the S-Class no doubt reigns supreme in China as elsewhere, the relatively lackluster star quality of the C-Class probably has customers there wondering if they really wouldn’t rather have a Buick.

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 38 comments
  • Junebug Junebug on Dec 19, 2012

    Unless I won the lottery, I'll never play in this sandbox. I do get to detail a bunch of these and talk to the owners. The MB 500 SL 4matic that my dentist use to have was (I thought) a great car, he said it was an expensive money pit and now has a BMW X5 diesel. Oh well..

  • Oldyak Oldyak on Dec 20, 2012

    as the owner of two older BMW`s I can only say that they are distinctive and awesome road cars. I wanted a BMW since I was young. Reading Car and Driver and Road and Track,and getting a ride in a new 2002 in high school solidified my desire. I cannot afford a new one and that's OK. My point is....what was Mercedes doing for the enthusiast back then? They had their chance many times over.......

    • See 2 previous
    • Porschespeed Porschespeed on Dec 20, 2012

      @Corey Lewis Forgetting the original 300SL?

  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next