Hey Readers; Tell Us About Your TWATs

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Some time ago in TTACs history, the site held an award for the poorest choices in the automobile kingdom. We called it the Ten Worst Automobiles Today – or, the TWATs, for short. It’s been almost 4 years since the TWATs were last run, but for 2012, they’re back.

Conventional wisdom has it that it’s pretty hard to buy a bad car nowadays. In 2008, that wasn’t the case. But 4 years on, the crop of cars has undeniably gotten much better. Boring may be the operative word, but it’s hard to find a truly wretched vehicle for sale.

Rather than handing down the gospel from on high, like every other auto site, we’re opening up the floor to you, the readers, to nominate cars for the TWAT awards.

Rules will be similar to the Farago era. We are still tweaking the rules for this year’s competition, but here are the old rules, for reference.

1. Any car or light truck offered for sale as a new vehicle in the U.S. between January 1 and today is eligible for nomination. I know those of you in Canada and other countries feel left out, but we have to draw the line somewhere to keep this under control. It doesn’t matter who built it or where, just that it’s sold legally in the States.

2. All nominations have to be justified. That doesn’t mean just saying it’s a POS car. Tell us WHY it’s a POS car. Nominations may be deleted unceremoniously and without warning for any of the following reasons: insufficient justification, excessive verbosity or pontification, foul language or patent absurdity.

3. All nominations must meet TTAC’s house rules on flaming or trolling (i.e., don’t). Offensive comments about other readers will be summarily deleted and the writer could be banned from TTAC. However, offensive observations about the nominees are encouraged.

4. Blatantly badge-engineered siblings can be nominated jointly if they all suck equally (see winner #8 above). Platform mates can be nominated separately, but may be combined at the whim of the editor for the final vote.

5. If we can wake them up long enough, TTAC’s writers will select finalists from the nominees, give or take a few. The number of times a vehicle is nominated is irrelevant so don’t waste the pixels on typing “me too.”

6. Readers will vote via an electronic survey on the finalists to determine America’s Ten Worst Vehicles. Multiple voting ain’t kosher so don’t even try.

7. Nominations begin today and will continue until midnight EDT, Sunday December 8, with the 20 finalists presented for voting a few days afterwards. The winners will be announced whenever we get around to it. We have nothing to give the winners but our disdain, so the winning manufacturers will find out about it like everyone else.

How do you decide what crapmoblies are worthy of your attention?

– Styling so bad it could even make Stevie Wonder look the other way.

– A market misfit that makes you wonder what the product planners were smoking, drinking, shooting up or otherwise self-administering.

– Engineering malpractice that makes the vehicle practically undrivable or so bland you wouldn’t want to drive it.

– Something that you can’t quite put your finger on but gives you the urge to regurge anytime you think about it.

So now it’s in your court. Make your nominations below and tell us which ones you think are really deserving of being named one of TTAC’s Ten Worst Vehicles.

Following the poll, our editors will chime in with some of their own choices, and Murilee will present his list of most wretched rental cars.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 223 comments
  • Bill mcgee Bill mcgee on Sep 13, 2012

    Agree about the ugly and impractical Mini coupe . Also Dodge Calibre and Nitro , if they're in the time frame . Driven both of these = awful driving , awful interior Smart car Nissan Juke ( yeah it's distinctive , so were Datsun F10 and Saturn ION ) and Versa sedan -awful , hunchbacked dimensions ) the entire Lincoln line - enough is enough , pull the plug on it

  • Dolorean Dolorean on Sep 13, 2012

    For a matter of perspective, here's the list from AutoBlog of the worst selling vehicles of 2011: 10. Subaru Tribeca MSRP: $30,595 Units Sold: 2,791 9. Mazda Tribute MSRP: $20,555 Units Sold: 2,696 8. Mercedes-Benz R-Class MSRP: $52,690 Units Sold: 2,385 7. Suzuki Equator MSRP: $17,899 Units Sold: 2,127 6. Cadillac Escalade EXT* MSRP: $63,060 Units Sold: 2,036 5. Toyota Land Cruiser MSRP: $68,920 Units Sold: 1,662 4. Acura ZDX MSRP: $46,020 Units Sold: 1,564 3. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback* MSRP: $18,395 Units Sold: 1,548 2. Hyundai Azera MSRP: $25,495 Units Sold: 1,524 1. Acura RL MSRP: $47,700 Units Sold: 1,096 You may notice, many are cars mentioned so far. Apparently the American public isn't as stupid as we thought.

  • Brian Uchida Laguna Seca, corkscrew, (drying track off in rental car prior to Superbike test session), at speed - turn 9 big Willow Springs racing a motorcycle,- at greater speed (but riding shotgun) - The Carrousel at Sears Point in a 1981 PA9 Osella 2 litre FIA racer with Eddie Lawson at the wheel! (apologies for not being brief!)
  • Mister It wasn't helped any by the horrible fuel economy for what it was... something like 22mpg city, iirc.
  • Lorenzo I shop for all-season tires that have good wet and dry pavement grip and use them year-round. Nothing works on black ice, and I stopped driving in snow long ago - I'll wait until the streets and highways are plowed, when all-seasons are good enough. After all, I don't live in Canada or deep in the snow zone.
  • FormerFF I’m in Atlanta. The summers go on in April and come off in October. I have a Cayman that stays on summer tires year round and gets driven on winter days when the temperature gets above 45 F and it’s dry, which is usually at least once a week.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I've never driven anything that would justify having summer tires.
Next