Capsule Review: Tesla Model S

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

What good is a twenty-minute test drive?

Well, when most sources are getting a ten minute test drive, a twenty-minute one is twice as good. The problem, of course, is that range is as critical to an electric car as tensile strength is to parachutes; it’s the difference between a safe arrival and a harrowing trip. Without a genuine understanding of the Tesla’s range, we can’t say for sure whether it’s a great car or not.

That doesn’t mean we can’t pass along what we did learn during those twenty minutes.

We can start with the physical envelope of the car, which is similar to that of a Jaguar XF. The looks are Jaguaresque as well. Franz von Holzhausen, the man responsible for styling the big Tesla, also penned the Solstice/Sky twins for General Motors. Like those ill-fated droptops, the Model S has a packaging issue; in this case, it’s rear headroom, which is sacrificed to the false god of faux-coupe styling. It’s a shame, because rear legroom is solid and with no central tunnel it might be possible for a third person to be reasonably comfortable in the middle seat. Tesla reps tell us that the panoramic roof, available as an option, actually adds an inch of headroom, but our car came without it, or the rear jump seats and their Fifty Shades of Grey-esque five point harnesses.

The Tesla Roadster was universally panned for interior quality. In the case of the Roadster, which was based on the pre-Bahar Lotus Elise, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. The Model S, by contrast, is a significant leap forward. The interior design is unique and distinctive without straying too far from the interior template set by the E65 BMW and its imitative successors. The only parts-bin contribution we recognized was the Mercedes-Benz column shifter. Although there was a loose trim piece on a door, this was an early series production car and overall the interior meets the expectations of this market.

Since Tesla expects to reach out to the tech-savvy crowd, they’ve gone through the trouble of providing what looks like an iPad class-leading center display. It’s Internet-enabled and it’s big enough to read your favorite website site — or, if that doesn’t load, you can check out TTAC, as seen below. If you aren’t interested in looking at photographs of rope bondage, and want to do unmentionable things like change the temperature or radio station, it’s all done through the giant touch screen, and it works fairly well. How it will hold up in a decade’s time is perhaps the second most interesting variable.

Naturally, we don’t recommend that you surf and drive, particularly when operating a vehicle with this kind of power. Although the Model S won’t keep up with the warp drive Tesla Roadster Sport, it’s fast enough. The kind of “electric-motor thrust” often found in reviews of turbocharged German luxury sedans is provided here by an actual electric motor. Our test variant was the most powerful one; however, due to some misdeeds by other participants in this event we were hard-limited to 80 miles per hour. The Model S reaches that in a hurry, no sweat. As you’d expect from an electric vehicle, the power delivery is linear and muscular. There’s no sportbike-esque exhilaration like you’d find in the Roadster, but it’s plenty quick, launching forward with the same urgency of a Porsche Panamera. The Porker relies on all-wheel drive and the big V8 to launch away from a light; in the Model S, that sensation of an aircraft carrier catapult launch is magnified. The power is always available right now in a way that no gasoline car can match. The flat-and-straight nature of our Missisauga, Ontario test venue prohibited us from verifying claims of totally flat, telepathic cornering and whatever superlatives have been heaped on this car. Unlike the Roadster, the Model S won’t be expected to corner like a go-kart or any of the things people typically have in mind when they say something corners like a go-kart.

The Model S is spacious, and quick, and stylish, and it’s frankly a wonder that it got built at all in an era when the engineering, design, assembly, and distribution of a motor vehicle happens at a scale that would impress the architects of the Manhattan Project. Until the range question is answered, however, it’s impossible to know whether this Manhattan Project produced a vehicle that is the bomb… or just a bomb, period.




Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 80 comments
  • DaeGoesFast DaeGoesFast on Aug 20, 2012

    Oh how highly the uninitiated wave their dull and tattered flags. Life moves on and new tech will always be there to pick up the torch when the old tech can last no longer. Let me first say this: Modern internal combustion engines are nothing short of being mechanical miracles. The amount of engineering that has gone into extending their life cycle in this giant industry is a tribute to the deep set love that many of us have had for a car at least once in our lives. But it can't go on forever, at least not in the way of petrol engines maintaining a 99.9% monopoly over mass transportation (I pulled that number out of my ass, butt how far off can it really be?). Changes need to happen for the same reasons that emission laws were put into place in 1994, and for the same reasons that the CAFE regulations are being met today. The problem is that these changes add to the complexity and cost of the internal combustion engine for continually more marginal gains, which ironically led automakers to recognize that the best way to improve their engine's efficiency was to pass some of the workload to an electric motor. That should say enough on its own. So one of issues that some have commented on is essentially the lack of tactile feedback of the touch screen. There has already been progress on this front. Do a search for, "iPad joystick". This small, cheap, clever device uses a suction cup to attach itself to the touch screen. When you tilt the joystick, your own electrical capacitance is translated to the screen through the stick itself, giving you a more consistent and repeatable interaction with the device. With my imagination, I can easily apply the same concept to a clicky dial that would function in the same way that my car's HVAC knob does. The software would just need to support it with an implementable option in a standard universal update. EZ PZ! This car breaks boundaries and if you are someone that can't get excited about that because of the powertrain it doesn't use then I don't get how you can really consider yourself a driving enthusiast.

  • INeon INeon on Aug 20, 2012

    Tesla loose trim mention: "Although there was a loose trim piece on a door, this was an early series production car and overall the interior meets the expectations of this market." Chrysler loose trim mention: "the only glaring quality control issue on a car with 2,940 miles reading on the odometer was a piece of wood trim above the glove box whose double sided tape was failing so the trim was hanging a bit loosely." One is acceptable, one is a glaring quality-control issue.

    • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Aug 20, 2012

      Two different reviewers. The wood trim in the Chrysler 300 that I reviewed was glaring because it was impossible to not notice it and the more so because the rest of the fit and finish in the cabin was outstanding. Should I not have mentioned it? Overall I gave the car a very positive review. That trim and a couple of electronic glitches were the only negative things that I mentioned in the entire article. I said that I could be quite happy with the car as my daily driver and praised just about everything in the car. Someone at Chrysler wanted TTAC to review that car so I'm pretty sure that the finished review was read by one or more people in Auburn Hills. I'm a native Detroiter and I'd rather not slag off the local car companies but I have to tell readers and Chrysler my honest opinions. My hope is that someone in Auburn Hills read about the loose trim and at least looked into why it was coming loose.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I will drive my Frontier into the ground, but for a daily, I'd go with a perfectly fine Versa SR or Mazda3.
  • Zerofoo The green arguments for EVs here are interesting...lithium, cobalt and nickel mines are some of the most polluting things on this planet - even more so when they are operated in 3rd world countries.
  • JMII Let me know when this a real vehicle, with 3 pedals... and comes in yellow like my '89 Prelude Si. Given Honda's track record over the last two decades I am not getting my hopes up.
  • JMII I did them on my C7 because somehow GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. These are brighter then OEM despite the smoke tint look.I got them here: https://www.corvettepartsandaccessories.com/products/c7-corvette-oracle-concept-sidemarker-set?variant=1401801736202
  • 28-Cars-Later Why RHO? Were Gamma and Epsilon already taken?
Next