Bricklynn and Civitown: Speed Limits (Pt. 1)

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

Is Social Security the third rail of politics?

Perhaps. I don’t know a single politician who ever got elected by telling his constituents, “Let’s cut Social Security expenditures to seniors.”

That would almost be like trying to become the CEO of a company by telling the senior executives, “You know… we get paid far too much for the work we do. Let’s cut our pay and while we’re at it, reduce our executive pension programs.”

In a similar vein, raising speed limits tends to get a similar reception with most county and city governments. The lost revenue. The safety issues. The ‘children’. When discussing this idea in any public meeting, you’re likely to get little more than a combination of glazed eyes and hard stares from city officials.

But it’s a bit different in Bricklynn. That’s because Bricklynn’s citizens are a bit more involved in their town’s decision making than usual.

You won’t find speed traps anywhere in Bricklynn. Why? Because they consider it bad for business and highly unethical.

A person who gets pulled over due to an arbitrary lowering of the speed limit, without any reasonable change in road conditions, is one ticked off person. To put it in an even more blunt manner, stealing and inflicting hardship on your fellow citizens is a non-negotiable in the town of Bricklynn.

What is open to discussion in Bricklynn are the speed limits. There is a common belief with many folks throughout all levels of Bricklynn’s society that unreasonable laws encourages disrespect and lawbreaking at all levels of society.

Speed limits are seen as the most frequent law most Bricklynnites will deal with over the course of their day. They have to be safe, reasonable, and they have to encourage respect for the law. If city officials instituted a 40 mph speed limit on a road where cars routinely drive at 55 mph, it would represent a complete breakdown of the social contract between citizens and their government.

So in Bricklynn… speed limits are limits.

In the United States most federal and state traffic laws promote an 85th percentile for speed. However there is a well-established theory, based on extended long-term studies of driving behavior, that raising speed limits on most roads only has an impact on compliance with that law. Accidents, fatalities and even the speeds driven are not substantially changed by instituting more reasonable speed limits.

Speed is not the primary concern for most Bricklynnites these days anyhow. It’s distracted driving and other safety issues that are due to neglect and carelessness.

You can have a handheld cell phone in your car. Just don’t use it while the vehicle is moving. There are a few mobile signs that state the following,

“Need to use a phone? Pull over! Stay safe!”

Most folks will simply get a warning the first time they violate this law. The second time always results in a fine and confiscation of the handheld device. The law is written in Bricklynnese. But here is the English translation.

“Bricklynn has banned the use of handheld cell phones, text messaging devices, laptop computers and similar wireless gear in moving vehicles. The secondary penalties for violation of this law shall include fines of up to $500. Confiscation of the mobile device. Immediate impounding of the motorized vehicle, and in the case of reckless driving that results in injury or property damage, all of the above along with jail time. As a level three misdemeanor, the period of imprisonment for violating this law, will be no less than three days and no more than 30 days. All violators will be given one warning, and one warning only. No exceptions!”

Bricklynn has considered many other laws that avoid traffic congestion and encourage public safety while respecting the constitutional rights of their citizens. Most of them have not passed due to the lack of interest in making Bricklynn an expensive guinea pig in a process they can not control. There is also a general distaste for employing high tech solutions such as the ones enacted in nearby Civitown. Most notably those traffic enforcement tools that effectively cede the local government’s traffic enforcement to third party private vendors.

There are a few cameras which monitor busy intersections. But those are owned by the city, and the long pauses between light changes make those intersections unprofitable for the private sector.

Unlike Civitown, Bricklynn is always open to new ideas from the public they serve; especially those that exact minimal to no cost for their citizens. So if you have any concepts or systems that would be worth discussing, please feel free.

The world should always be open to better ideas.


Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 41 comments
  • DC Bruce DC Bruce on Jun 26, 2012

    The 85th percentile rule works most of the time . . . on limited access highways. On city streets and unlimited access highways, I'm not so sure. There, the speed limit has to account for people pulling out of their driveways, parallel parking, entering from side streets and so on. Even the 85th percentile rule doesn't always work on limited access highways if they weren't designed correctly. For example, the Capital Beltway (I-495) a circumferential highway around the City of Washington that was designed in the late 1950s. The speed limit is 55; I would guess the 85th percentile speed is closer to 65. The problem is that some of the entrance ramps do not have a long enough acceleration lane to even permit an entering driver to accurately judge the speed of the traffic he's merging into, even assuming he has a vehicle with sufficient acceleration capability to do so without forcing the traffic to slow down. The experienced Beltway driver knows this and therefore avoids the right lane whenever possible, except when he's preparing to exit. But even that behavior creates its own set of problems. . . Automated speed traps have their own problems, arising from the fact that they leave no room for judgment. Busting down a highway at 4:00 a.m. at 15 over the limit is most likely not the least bit unsafe; whereas doing that at 4:00 p.m. very well might be. And speed traps in urban areas are pure nonsense. The speed of traffic on major streets can be effectively controlled by traffic signals. If there are knuckleheads who exceed the speed limit only to sit and wait at the next red light, they're very unlikely to create a significant safety hazard.

    • See 3 previous
    • R H R H on Jun 27, 2012

      @Pch101 I agree. They usually ride 5' off the bumper of my sport bike even if I'm in the middle lane going with the flow of traffic...

  • Chicagoland Chicagoland on Jun 26, 2012

    Here in suburban Chicago area, we still have 55, and 95% go over 70! But, the Democrats cater to inner city saftey nuts. "Oh no, we can't have that speed limit, everyone will die!" Only 65 when you get 60 miles from the Loop. Indiana, Missouri, Michigan have 70 on Interstates, and 60-65 in their suburbs, even 60 in cities! IL politicians spend too much time in city, and think all Interstates are like Lake Shore Drive, crowded and "OMG you will die going 70!" But, it's all about tickets.

    • R H R H on Jun 27, 2012

      * 1000! I just got back from visiting Grandma in Virginia and lo and behold my gps (which I haven't updated in a while) had WRONG speed limits for almost all the major interstates! The GPS indicated lower than posted (55 in a 65, 65 in a 70, etc) which means the states must have raised the limits within the last few years. Illinois? Still at 55.... If you'd like to see how silly the 55 limit is, take 294 north of o-hare until it merges with 94. Sometimes there are no cars within a mile of you....

  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
  • ChristianWimmer My girlfriend has a BMW i3S. She has no garage. Her car parks on the street in front of her apartment throughout the year. The closest charging station in her neighborhood is about 1 kilometer away. She has no EV-charging at work.When her charge is low and she’s on the way home, she will visit that closest 1 km away charger (which can charge two cars) , park her car there (if it’s not occupied) and then she has two hours time to charge her car before she is by law required to move. After hooking up her car to the charger, she has to walk that 1 km home and go back in 2 hours. It’s not practical for sure and she does find it annoying.Her daily trip to work is about 8 km. The 225 km range of her BMW i3S will last her for a week or two and that’s fine for her. I would never be able to handle this “stress”. I prefer pulling up to a gas station, spend barely 2 minutes filling up my small 53 liter fuel tank, pay for the gas and then manage almost 720 km range in my 25-35% thermal efficient internal combustion engine vehicle.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Here in North Korea we are lucky to have any tires.
  • Drnoose Tim, perhaps you should prepare for a conversation like that BEFORE you go on. The reality is, range and charging is everything, and you know that. Better luck next time!
  • Buickman burn that oil!
Next