Junkyard Find: 1971 Fiat 124 Sport Spider

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

In my 30 years of crawling through junkyards, one thing has remained constant: there’s almost always a Fiat 124 Sport Spider to be found. Crusher-bound 124 Spiders are about exactly as common now as they were in the early 1980s, and I suspect they’ll be just as common in 2032. I usually don’t even bother to photograph them (though I have documented this ’78 and this ’75), but lately I’ve developed some affection for the sports car that made the MGB seem reliable. Here’s one— a little older than most— that I spotted in a Northern California yard earlier in the month.

Genuine Pininfarina design here!

The Fiat Twin Cam engine in this car displaced 1438cc and made a decent 96 horses in ’71, but that number dropped a lot when emission laws and net horsepower ratings came into play. The Twin Cam got bigger as the decade went on, but the power got smaller.

Look, a number on the door. Race car!






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • Cleek Cleek on Mar 01, 2012

    I can remember the '70's spider maintenance section of the manual had "check for leaks" in its periodic listings.

  • Mike_Aldea Mike_Aldea on May 14, 2012

    I dispute the idea that the Fiat 124 Spider was mechanically unreliable. I drove my 1971 Fiat 124 Spider with the 1608cc engine for 130k miles before selling it. During that the entire time I owned that car I only replaced the following: * OEM exhaust when it rusted out with a dual wall aftermarket one * Water Pump * Alternator-Voltage Regulator which was a combined unit * Timing Belt as part of normal maintenance. * Convertible Top when the rear window became too scratched and yellow to see clearly * Seal Beam Headlamps with European Quartz replacement units for better performance. None of this was unusual for a 1970s era automobile. The only reason I sold the car instead of restoring it was due to the bad corrosion through the rocker panels. Because the car was unit body construction and not body on frame it would have been prohibitively expensive to try and repair. Eventually that corrosion was going to lead to dangerous body flex. The corrosion problem was not that unusual for an imported vehicle here in the Northeast rust belt. Rust prevention on automobiles has come a long way since then. I was so happy with my Fiat that in 1982 I encourage my girl friend to buy a used 1979 Fiat 124 Spider. She enjoyed that car for many years. But between the raised ride height to bring the headlamps up to the federally mandated minimum height and the heavy federalized bumpers it did not handle as well as my 1971 nor was it as quick. Those monstrous bumpers also really ruined the lines of that classic Pininfarina design.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next