Watching Your Car Get Serviced Via Smartphone An Integral Part Of Lincoln Strategy

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Lincoln’s free-falling sales will apparently be remedied by allowing customers to watch their cars get serviced via smart phone, if you can stomach the party line coming from Ford marketing boss Jim Farley. Also outlined were Lincoln’s idea of “luxury” and powertrain details for the upcoming MKZ

First and foremost, the MKZ will get unique powertrains, and with the Fusion packing only 4-cylinders, this must mean a V6 engine is slated for the MKZ. Automotive News also detailed Lincoln’s new approach to customer service with Farley stating

“It’s as if some luxury brands have become big-box retailers, efficient and soulless, forgetting the hallmarks that made them special in the first place and leaving their clients feeling like a number and not a name,”

Poor customer service and haughty sales people have never stopped aspirational strivers from buying luxury goods – sales staff at Saks or Neiman Marcus have a lot of attitude considering that they make minimum wage, but that won’t stop credit card jockeys from snapping up the latest branded crap sewn by Indonesian child labor. On the other hand, good sales people know that their wealthy clients often come in dressed like paupers because they couldn’t care less about “projecting an image of success” like so many status insecure upper-middle types.

The most peculiar passage in the entire article detailed a cockamaime plan where “… service bays at Lincoln dealerships will have cameras so customers can use their smartphones to watch the work being performed on their cars.” Based on anecdotal evidence gleaned through a couple decades of life experience, the sort of affluent, professional trend-setter types Lincoln is hoping to attract either don’t have the time or inclination to watch a grease-splattered Lincoln tech change the oil or bleed the brakes on their leased MKZ. This will surely be a costly initiative, and the money could have been spent in a million more productive ways aside from a stupid gimmick like this. If you are one of those types who wants to watch your car get a brake job via your iPhone, please let me know in the comments. For more laughable ideas, see the first paragraph of the Automotive News article where Lincoln’s negligible market-share is glossed over as a virtue of it being a “boutique brand”

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 48 comments
  • Npbheights Npbheights on Jan 17, 2012

    The few times I have had to bring one of our MKZ's in for warranty work they hand me the keys to a nearly Lincoln loaner. Once I got an MKZ with less than 10 miles on it and once I got a Mustang Convertible with less than 10 miles on it and they apologized repeatedly because it was not a Lincoln. So, when I get work done on the Lincoln I have no interst in watching it get done or having it done quickly. I bring it in on Friday afternoon on purpose ...

    • See 1 previous
    • Npbheights Npbheights on Jan 18, 2012

      @MrWhopee Our MKZ's are first generation models and the loaners are second generation models, which have a different look inside and out and a surprisingly different feel when you drive them considering that they were just an update of the existing platform. I have driven a MKS and that is a completely different experience. It's a much bigger car. I have driven a 2011 Fusion V6 and would not even consider owning one, the interior looked really cheap compared to the MKZ (old or new). Also, Lincolns being upgraded Fords becomes a positive trait when they get older. Most of the things you don't see, like brake parts and under hood stuff are identicle to Fords and are priced accordingly. It makes it much more affordable to own a classic Lincoln than a classic Cadillac (I have owned both). When people rant on here that Lincolns are redundant to Fords I know that they don't own one and that it's a pretty sure bet that they have not even been in one. Oh, and the Mustang was nice but I disliked the coal bin (black and charcoal) interior, the seats were uncomfortable, and it felt like i was sitting really low in the car. It need to be a few inches longer, better taller seats, an upgraded interior, and an Independent rear suspension ... In other words, it needed to be a Mark IX.

  • Akitadog Akitadog on Jan 18, 2012

    "On the other hand, good sales people know that their wealthy clients often come in dressed like paupers because they couldn’t care less about “projecting an image of success” like so many status insecure upper-middle types." An amazingly astute observation. I give a cheer for at least one Gen-Yer's ability to see through the bullsh*t.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next