NAIAS Tidbits: Mazda MX-5 Spyder

by Jack Baruth

Published: January 10th, 2012

Here’s another SEMA refugee: the Mazda MX-5 “Spyder”. The current Miata’s choice of normal fabric roof or what-the-f***-are-you-thinking power retractable hardtop is neatly avoided in favor of the kind of stretchy, do-it-yourself job that ensures Porsche 911 “Speedster” owners never actually drive their cars anywhere.

We’ve seen a better Miata Spyder, though… click the jump for a blast into the wacky kit-car past.

This is the Simpson Design Italia. In the metal, it’s a very pretty combination of first-gen Miata and NART Spyder. Simpson makes a variety of Miata kits. Check it. Which leads to the question: If a guy in a shed can make the Miata pretty, why can’t Mazda do it?

Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 27 comments

Bikewritercat on Jan 11, 2012

Miata kits are for people who like kits, or who are more interested in making their Miatas look like something different or something more expensive, which often makes the cars look cheaper and kills their resale. Nonetheless, if a kit trips your trigger, go for it. Likewise, the power hardtop is for people who want a power hardtop. People who want a new Miata without a power hardtop still have that option. I encourage people who don't want a Miata, a kit, a convertible or a power hardtop to pursue their automotive dreams through other, more accomodating venues. I wish I could carry my Co-Motion tandem in the trunk of my 1996 Miata, but I'd have a hard time saying Mazda made a mistake by designing the car the way they did. After all, carrying a tandem is the reason Ford still makes my Ranger. Err...

Like Reply
Manny Calavera on Jan 16, 2012

Miata never was as "competent" as a Boxster, but then, it never claimed to be. It is as simple fun as you can get while remaining affordable and roadworthy (safety regs, reliability etc). The PRHT is a convenience option. It's not as Bad as having a slushbox in a Miata (heaven forfend), only because it doesn't take much away from the fun factor. But then it is added complexity and weight, and that is against what an MX-5 stands for. So it is a Mild Transgression, and can be forgiven on a case-by-case basis.. The spyder is also another transgression: an MX-5 should also be simple. And there can be nothing simple about pitching that Bedouin tent, especially when you already have a soft-top that can be flipped back in two seconds flat.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.